30 POINTS! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST ! HELP!

1 answer:

7 0

The first paragraph

Caesar was beloved by many after the war he was looked upon as a god by his supports and soon decided to do things his own way and well Brutus wanted to be in charge because he is jealous of Caesar. So Brutus convinced the council that Caesar will betray Athens or wherever he lives and bring it to the ground and he’ll run off with the money so the council and Brutus came up with a plan to kill Caesar. Caesars supports loved him and think of him as a god and causes the conspirators to come up with the plane and get rid of him for good.

Second paragraph

The conflict was later resolved by all of the council coming together and murder Caesar at the council, each member came and stab Caesar and the final blow came from Brutus in which Caesar looked and say “e tu bruta” or something like that which translate to you too Brutus and he died. After they killed him Brutus and the other conspirators ran away from authorities but was later captured and killed

You might be interested in

Write an opinion paragraph on a social issue, such as human rights or conversation. Ise modal expressions to Express your opinio

ASHA 777 [7]

Answer: sorry but this MIGHT help

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 84 percent of unneeded clothing ends up in landfills or incinerators.[i] On account of this, we should note that although al...

3 0

2 years ago

1. Sue ran 9/10 mile on Monday and 7/10 mile on Tuesday. How many miles did Sue run in the 2 days? *

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

1.6 miles

9+7/10 = 16/10 miles

= 1.6 miles

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

10. The best ——- of this flat is its central location.

cestrela7 [59]

7) feature is the correct one

3 0

2 years ago

Select the word that best completes the sentence.

nataly862011 [7]

For anyone who still needs the answer it is ''conservation''

3 0

3 years ago

Explain the distinction Kant makes between guardians and minors. Who are these two groups and what sets them apart from one anot

Tresset [83]

Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.

3 0

3 years ago