7 981 943 000 Millimeters
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This is not a linear relationship, it doesn't have a set increase or uniform slope and it seems more like an exponential or quadratic curve to me when I graph it. As you can see you cant draw a straight line through the data points so it cannot be a linear relationship.
Answer:
6 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
If the original side length is x, then the modified square has an area of ...
A = LW
32 = (x +2)(x -2) = x^2 -4
36 = x^2 . . . . . . . . add 4
6 = x . . . . . . . . . . take the square root
The original figure has a side length of 6 cm.
__
<em>Check</em>
The modified figure is 8 cm by 4 cm = 32 cm^2.
Since we know that the 38 is being bisected (which we can tell by the fact that the line hits it perpendicularly), we know that from the intersection to the edge of the circle is 19. From this we can create a right triangle in which the legs are 10 and 19 and the hypotenuse is a radius of the circle. Since x is also a radius of the circle, all we have to do is use that information to find the hypotenuse using the Pythagorean Theorem and we have x.
Pythagorean Theorem
+
=
+
=
100 + 361 =
461 =
x =
or about 21.47
By definition, two angles are supplementary if the sum of them is 180 degrees. In this case (see figure attached with the answer) the line AD is transversal to lines AB and DC. This is a proof of the Same-side interior angle theorem.
This theorem states that if we have two lines that are parallel and we intercept those two lines with a line that is transversal to both, same-side interior angles are formed, and also sum 180º, in other words, they are supplementary angles.
Then:
By the definition of a parallelogram, AB∥DC. AD is a transversal between these sides, so ∠A and ∠D are <em><u>same-side interior angles</u></em>. Because AB and DC are <em><u>parallel</u></em>, the same-side interior angles must be <em><u>supplementary</u></em> by the same-side interior angles theorem. Therefore, ∠A and ∠D are supplementary.