Answer:
Taught them to tame their horses, which were an important part in their culture.
Taught them to use numbers and how to count.
She taught them victory without the bloodshed.
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Hi there!
Well, yes and no. The US Constitution is the supreme law it answers all the big questions and issues. But, it does leave a lot things for each state to cover in it's own constitution.
I hope this helps!
Brady
Answer:
E
Explanation:
a bio-psycho-social perspective
People around the world may experience the same genetically based disorder quite differently depending on their own personal expectations and the definitions of abnormality common to their unique culture.
