1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
6

In a paragraph of 125+ words, express your opinion regarding when it should be permissible for the rights of an individual or gr

oup to be infringed on.
History
1 answer:
Tems11 [23]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The only time I believe it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group is doing any kind of wrongdoing such as harming another person, or a person's happiness or property.  You shouldn't have any right to affect another's group rights or decision unless it causes harm or indirect harm.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explain how the geography of Russia is similar and different from that of the United States?
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

Both countries have a wealth of natural resources and a diverse climate. Both Russia and the United States are difficult to avoid in political alliances because of their size, which, along with their military might, makes them difficult to ignore. It is no surprise that both countries are central states of their regional alliances and will remain so for several years, despite challenges.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Please mark  me as Brainlinieast.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain impeachment and the process that Congress must follow during impeachment.
makkiz [27]

Answer:

In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by simple majority vote, articles of impeachment. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Plz help ;w;<br> will give brainliest for it-
MariettaO [177]

Answer: A. Black Bean Episode

Explanation:

An aftermath of the Mier Expedition.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
• Many Greek city-states began to resent Athens's arrogance and misuse of the Delian League's treasury, and they turned to Spart
ELEN [110]
War wad D and <span>Athenians surrendered to the Spartans in 404 B.C.E.
• Sparta emerged from the war as a still-powerful city-state, 

</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the progressives oppose the taft?
    11·1 answer
  • If 75% of India’s rural population lives in poverty, it most likely means that
    9·2 answers
  • Who started communism
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following did the Articles of Confederation do?
    10·1 answer
  • Something that keeps goods from moving in or out (social studies)
    10·1 answer
  • According to Jefferson, which of the following men embodied the values of virtue and wholesomeness.
    10·2 answers
  • What were the major events that occurred during the Holocaust, and how did they impact targeted groups?
    15·2 answers
  • Reba Gomez bought an airline ticket<br> whose selling price is $654.34 and sales<br> tax rate is 5%.
    15·2 answers
  • The words “Equal Justice Under Law” can be found where?
    6·1 answer
  • Early democracy was limited because women, foreigners, and slaves were not allowed to vote or participate in assemblies. Why do
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!