1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
6

In a paragraph of 125+ words, express your opinion regarding when it should be permissible for the rights of an individual or gr

oup to be infringed on.
History
1 answer:
Tems11 [23]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The only time I believe it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group is doing any kind of wrongdoing such as harming another person, or a person's happiness or property.  You shouldn't have any right to affect another's group rights or decision unless it causes harm or indirect harm.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
There are important elections held throughout the US at every level except the __________ level.
Brums [2.3K]

Answer: (A) International

3 0
3 years ago
Describe how the region of Southeast Asia has influences from both East Asia and South Asia? Provide at least one example of bot
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

It has influenced the area because the imports and exports in the area goes to the areas and shipping routes

6 0
3 years ago
How does Tecumseh’s speech illustrate differences between Indian and American views of land as private property?
aliya0001 [1]

Towards the end of the 1780s Tecumseh, together with his brother Elskwatawa or Tenskwatawa, who was called "the prophet", created an alliance of the native peoples against the expansion of the American colonists in the territories of the great lakes, north of the Midwest and the Ohio River Valley. The alliance suffered some changes over time, but was formed by several important Indian peoples.

In September 1809, William Henry Harrison, governor of the newly formed Indiana Territory, negotiated the Fort Wayne Treaty in which a delegation of Indians yielded 3 million acres (12,000 km²) of Native American territory to the government of the United States. U.S. The negotiations of the treaty were questionable since they did not have the support of the then US President James Madison, and involved what some historians have compared with a bribe, consisting of the offer of large subsidies to the tribes and chiefs involved, and the previous distribution, among the indigenous participants, of copious amounts of liquor before the negotiations to "dispose the temperaments" to them.

Tecumseh's opposition to the landmark Fort Wayne Treaty marked the emergence of the Shawnee warrior as an outstanding leader and earned him the respect of several tribes. Although Tecumseh and his people, the Shawnees had no claim to the land sold, the indigenous leader was alarmed by the massive sale, since many of the followers who accompanied him in his capital Prophetstown ("Town of the Prophet"), belonged to the tribes Piankeshaw, Kikapú and Wea, which were habitual moradores of the tramposamente negotiated land. As an argument, Tecumseh revived an idea exposed in previous years by the Shawnee leader, Blue Jacket, and by the Mohawk leader, Joseph Brant, according to which Indian land was common property of all tribes, and no fraction of it could be sold. without the consent of all, or only by decision of a few.

8 0
3 years ago
John Quincy Adams influenced the United States role in the world by
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

<h2><em>Im cute</em></h2>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the following excerpt from the decrees of the Twenty-Fifth Council of Trent (1563) to answer the question: Whereas the power
12345 [234]
This passage we can say is a direct response the critique of indulgences raised by the Protestant reform.

In other words this could be a direct answer to Martin Luther and his 95 thesis, in which the selling of the indulgences, that is the forgiveness of sins in exchange of money, was the main issue. The Church states that the Christ himself gave the right to them to sell the indulgences and that that is the time-honored tradition.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a result of the industrial revolution in the United States
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Easy question: What is the capital of Kansas?
    11·2 answers
  • In 1983 oil prices in texas fell from $34 to $10 per barrel causing oil firms to struggle to stay in business which ultimately l
    15·2 answers
  • What were the main ideas of Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points?​
    14·2 answers
  • Why were World War I war bonds important to the war effort?
    11·2 answers
  • What year was the modern baseball error when no blacks were allowed to play?
    8·2 answers
  • NEED HELP
    13·1 answer
  • Which two statements are true of the Caddoan Mound Builders?
    5·1 answer
  • Question 2 of 10
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!