1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
3 years ago
7

Almost all terrestrial species spend their entire lives within a narrow zone that extends from a few tens of meters above the to

ps of the trees to a few meters below Earth's surface. Therefore, terrestrial organisms are relatively easy to study, as they are readily accessible and visible to the scientist. In contrast, ocean life is present throughout the depth of the ocean waters, and for several meters, or more, into the sediment.(Douglas A Segar, Introduction to Ocean Sciences)
A. Argument; conclusion: They are readily accessible ... scientist.
B. Argument; conclusion: Almost all terrestrial species ... surface.
C. Argument; conclusion: In contrast, ocean life ... the sediment.
D. Argument; conclusion: Terrestrial organisms are relatively easy to study.
E. Nonargument.
English
1 answer:
Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Hello, you didn't say what the task is, but I assume we have to choose the option that best describes the composition and the format of the excerpt from Douglas A Segar's <em>Introduction to the Ocean Sciences</em>. If so, I would choose D.

Explanation:

I chose D because the excerpt begins with the argument and continues with the conclusion, that is that "<em>terrestrial organisms are relatively easy to study</em>". Then, the study of terrestrial organisms are compared with the study of ocean life, that is not so easy due to its nature of being present "<em>throughout the depth of the ocean waters, and for several meters, or more, into the sediment.</em>" and it is not as easy to reach as the first one.

You might be interested in
Good Vegan, Bad Vegan
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

Why did the author decide to write it?

6 0
2 years ago
Chapters 1-5 summary for a good kind of trouble?
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

i hope u tat uy have a good trouble from tommorow okk bie

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
NEED ANSWER SOON PLZ HELP ME!!!!
kotegsom [21]
I believe the answers are B, C, and D.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a paragraph that answers the following questions. Be sure to use complete sentences.
never [62]

Answer:

Each of the question is explained briefly below.

Explanation:

1. Did the authors have similar or opposing views?

Answer: The authors have opposing views.

Explanation: The authors Alexander fisher and Juniper Springs, have opposing views about human colonization to Mars. Where the former explains about the technological growth and the advantages of using them to move to a second planet. The latter says that, instead of spending a huge sum of money to an unstable plant, we can spend the same money to restore the stability of the earth. Hence this clearly explains the opposing views between the authors.

2. Did the authors use the same points of comparison? Explain with examples. The authors use

Answer: The authors use same points of comparison.

Exaplanation: For example, the authors compare about radiations in the Mars' atmosphere. They also compare in terms of money. In general, whatever the points are explained were opposed by the latter author.

3. Did the authors support their views in the same or different ways?

Answer: The authors did not support, in any way, about the views.

Explanation: The authors did neither in terms of same or different ways of their opinion. They completely oppose each other.

4. Did both focus most on appeals to logic or to emotion?

Answer: Both focus on appeals to logic.

Explanation: The authors Alexander fisher and Juniper Springs focus on appeals to logic as they did not use any kind of emotional statement to claim their stand while discussing about colonizing in Mars.

3 0
3 years ago
Why does Elizabeth lie to Danforth about her husband's relationship with Abigail? What motivates her actions?
UkoKoshka [18]

She lied to save her husband's good name because she loves him.Because She Didnt Want Him to Get In Any Trouble And Have His Name Shame Put Out For Everyone to see.Elizabeth still loves her husband and wants to protect him. She, in part, blames herself for the affair. She also wants Proctor to admit his own sin rather than she condemning him.

Hope this helps Have a blessed day!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Speakers of the Aryan language came to Eastern Europe from the Tigris-Euphrates area.
    8·2 answers
  • What is the structure of “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between hearing and listening?
    15·1 answer
  • Which word is a preposition in the following sentence? Yellow is a great color for brightening a room.
    10·1 answer
  • Dana notes that although the State tested 14 cell phone tower sites, they only bring up _________ in trial. Why do they omit the
    11·1 answer
  • the conscious art of recognizing, understanding,and accurately interpreting a communicated message is called ___?
    12·1 answer
  • Change At dinner,six balls of kenkey were eaten by Kelvin to active voice ​
    12·2 answers
  • Please help me with this​
    12·1 answer
  • What is a declaritive?
    7·2 answers
  • *80 points for the correct answer ASAP*
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!