Answer:
The time line from minting to the first sale is:
0-192
$15 - $430,000
we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for r :
r = (FV/PV)1/t - 1
r = ($430,000/$15)1/192 - 1
r = .0549, or 5.49%
The time line from the first sale to the second sale is:
0-35
$430,000 - $4,582,500
we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Using the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for r:
r = (FV/PV)1/t - 1
r = ($4,582,500/$430,000)1/35 - 1
r = .0699, or 6.99%
The time line from minting to the second sale is:
0-227
$15 - $4,582,500
we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for r, we get:
r = (FV/PV)1/t - 1
r = ($4,582,500/$15)1/227 - 1
r = .0572, or 5.72%
Answer: See Explanation
Explanation:
The payback period for both projects would be calculated as:
Alpha Project
Cost = $530,000
Annual net cash flow = $60,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $530,000 / $60,000
= 8.83
Beta Project
Cost = $170,000
Annual net cash flow = $18,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $170,000 / $18,000
= 9.4
We can see that Alpha Project is better as the payback period is lesser than Beta project
Answer:
The amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
Explanation:
Here Mr and Mrs Dart owns a majority of shares of Wall corp, Black co, and West inc. In 2010 , wall made advanced cash to black($50,000) and west($80,000) and also west made advance to black($70,000).
While preparing the combined balance sheet for all these company's , any amount of account receivables will not be included because preparing a combined balance sheet is same as making consolidated balance sheet , were any inter company profit or losses , account receivables and payable are not included in the balance sheet , so therefore the amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
Answer:
Option (A)
Explanation:
If a corporation is found guilty of committed a crime. Then the corporation likely to face a hefty fines for committing a crime. This means the owners of the corporation and its stake holders are responsible for this crime if any of the employee of the corporation commits a crime. Hence at last the owners of the corporation and the stake holders are end up being punished.
In this case the perfect tender rule
b. does not apply.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule has certain exceptions where it cannot be applied to the tender parties and the probates of the tender.
If there is a government ruling against the use of certain products that are necessary for the tender to be completed and the outlaw happens after the tender is signed but before it is completed as a consignment then it cannot be done.
This would come under the ambit of an emergency where the governed ruling makes such deals null and void.
