1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
evablogger [386]
3 years ago
10

While a federal system places most government power in the hands of the national government, by contrast a confederal system is

best described as which of the following?
History
2 answers:
Elena L [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I believe the answer is: C. places more power in constituent states

Explanation:

When there is a dispute or contradiction between federal government and constituent states within a confederal system, the constituent states have the right to ignore the regulations created by the federal government and opted to handle the matters with their own method

Marrrta [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The confederal system of government place more powers on the state and local government.

Explanation:

The federal system of government is a system of government where power is shared between the central government and the federation unit or States. In which each level of government enjoy autonomy. In a federal system of government, power is categorized into three main issues which are exclusive list, concurrent list,and residual list. The issues in the exclusive list is preserved only for the federal government, while the issues in the concurrent list is preserved only for federal, state,and local government to legislate upon.While issues in the residual list are issues that may not be found in the concurrent list which the federal government can legislate upon.

On the other hand, a confederal system of government can be defined simply as a variation of the federal system of government in which there is an agreement for the component unit to secede or pull apart in case the union cannot hold together. Under a confederal system of government central government does not enjoy the loyalty of the citizens, in the sense that, loyalty of the citizens to the government is at the state or local government level.

Furthermore, it is a weak system of government in which the state had more powers than the central government. In the sense that, minerals and financial resources is controlled by the state and local government. However, they only contribute money to fund the central government.

You might be interested in
By 2015, how many companies controlled the major news networks you are most familiar with?
Simora [160]
This seems like a choose whatever question honestly, i would not go with one hundred tho.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kept MOST people from settling west Texas in the late 1800s?
Inessa [10]

Answer:

lack of water and droughts

Explanation:

west texas is very dry and arid

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is true of the development of western land, timber, gold, and oil?
nignag [31]
<span>All had a negative environment impact.----> TRUE!

The exploitatoin of these resources modified greatly the land and/or the air negetively.

All were abundant, renewable resources ---> they are  not renewable resources


All were carefully regulated ---> there were not regulations when exploitation started

All had been exploited by Native Americans ---> Native Americans didn't exploit those resources. Settlers did.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What did President John F. Kennedy do after learning about the Birmingham protests?​
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

By the time President Kennedy forced negotiations that ended segregation in Birmingham, the KKK began their bombing campaign. The most horrific impact of the campaign itself was the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing that killed four young girls in September of 1963.

Study.comhttps://study.com

5 0
3 years ago
What happened to the royal family? Do you think their fate was necessary? Why do you think the Soviets acted the way they did?
almond37 [142]

Answer:

The royal family were assassinated. their fate was necessary because the Romanov's were a symbol of totalitarianism during a period were the soviet union was suffering due to the royal family's decision to participate in the world war resulting is massive casualties and the lack of food for the Russian population whilst the royal family lived frivolously i.e the czar "Nicholas"  bought his wife the Faberge egg which is worth 33 million dollars as of today. The soviets needed a new form of  government who'm would think for the betterment of the people of Russia, by killing the royal family communism would take place because it promised that everything will be shared to everyone equally.  the soviets/Bolsheviks acted the way they did i.e killing the family because the family were a symbol of autocracy(totalitarianism) because they had absolute power over Russia.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What error in the election of 1800 proved the original system of the presidential electors to be flawed? A. The electors mistake
    13·2 answers
  • Which emperor first converted to Christianity?
    15·2 answers
  • Which term describes the widespread fear of communism in the 1950s? (Points : 3) Red Scare Yalu Flight Operation Bugout Commie P
    11·1 answer
  • Who are all the presidents who got asassinated?
    10·2 answers
  • Who escaped slavery and became a talented speaker who fought for human rights?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did many colonies gain independence after WWII?
    9·1 answer
  • What issue was addressed by the three-fifths compromise?A) How the slave population would be counted.B) How to regulate trade wi
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the British position toward Native Americans after the Revolutionary War?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Richard Henry Pratt view the Native Americans?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the role of noblewomen on a manor?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!