Answer:
By rounding up of the constant and coefficient terms, we have;
The line of best, fit is y = 1.23 + 3.46 × 10⁻²·x
Step-by-step explanation:
The table for the data on the number of movie admissions each year is presented as follows;
Year, x 
Admission, y
0 1.24
2 1.26
4 1.39
6 1.47
8 1.49
10 1.57
Using a graphing calculator, we have that the line of best fit is given by the following equation;
y = 1.23047619048 + 3.45714285714 × 10⁻²·x
Which is approximately, y = 1.23 + 3.46 × 10⁻²·x
Answer:
The null hypothesis is 
, in which x is the proportion tested.
The alternative hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
A recent article in a university newspaper claimed that the proportion of students who commute more than miles to school is no more than x.
This means that at the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at most x, that is:
Suppose that we suspect otherwise and carry out a hypothesis test.
The opposite of at most x is more than x, so the alternative hypothesis is:
Cost of fuel = 30% of $400 000 = 30/100 x 400000 = $120 000
Fuel amount = $120 000/$1.5 = 80 000 liters
new cost of fuel = 80000 x $1.6 = $144 000
increase in cost = 144000 - 120000 = $24000
So the increase in petrol price increases the operating cost by $24000
4) a. x+y=1–(1)
y=2x-8—(2)
(2) into (1)
x+(2x-8)=1
3x-8=1
3x=1+8
x=9/3
x=3—(3)
(3) into (2)
y=2(3)-8
y=-2
ans x=3, y=-2
b. x+y=19—(1)
y=5x+1—(2)
(2) into (1)
x+(5x+1)=19
6x+1=19
6x=19-1
x=18/6
x=3—(3)
(3) into (2)
y=5(3)+1
y=16
ans x=3, y=16
c.x+y=-2—(1)
y=x-10—(2)
(2) into (1)
x+(x-10)=-2
2x-10=-2
2x=-2+10
x=8/2
x=4–(3)
(3) into (2)
y=4-10
y=-6
ans x=4, y=-6
5) 3x=y—(1)
x=y-16–(2)
(2) into (1)
3(y-16)=y
3y-48=y
2y=48
y=48/2
y=24–(3)
(3) into (2)
x=24-16
x=8
ans x=8, y=24
524
This is answer
Because 524/100=5.24
