Answer:
Explanation:
The anti-war movement is a movement of group or individual usually in opposition or against a particular country or government decision to start a war or being involved in an armed conflicts
The Major positive impact of anti-war movement is that
1) The movement work through protest or other available means either by matching or placard waving to make efforts in making the government to put an end to a particular war or conflicts. This is turn leads to avoidance of casualty which would or maybe recorded in the conflict or war.
2) it makes the government accountable to it citizens
3) it leads to curbing of resources wastage
Some of the negative impart of anti-war is
1) Such movement might be highjacked by the opposition there using the movement for personal ambition or motives which is contrary to the main motive the movement was formed.
2) The protest may leads to violence there causing harm to people and property.
The ones who controlled the territories would have the main political power in the congress. If the states were slave states then it would bother non-slave states in the congress, and vice versa. That's why it was necessary to create new states that weren't the former Mexican ones that would help balance out the power of the two factions.
<span />
When Spaniards like Columbus, Cortes, and Pizzaro arrived in the "New World," at first their relations with native peoples were rather friendly. There were efforts to associate and negotiate with them. But the Spanish conquistadors ("conquerors") were always in a mindset of superiority and domination over the natives they encountered. If they sought the natives' trust, it was mainly so they could establish a relationship in which they, the Spanish, gained the upper hand. They looked upon the natives as a lesser sort of people and upon themselves as the bringers of proper civilization.
As Spanish efforts continued, they became more aggressive in their desire to gain wealth (gold or whatever other products they could exchange for such wealth). They enslaved natives and went to war with native tribes and nations.
Ultimately, the biggest way that the Europeans brought harm to the native populations, though, was in a way they didn't intend or understand. They brought with them germs and viruses from their continent that hadn't been known on the American continents, and so many natives became gravely ill and died. I've seen some estimates that say that smallpox killed up to 75% of the people in the Inca empire (in Peru) before the epidemics of that disease ran their course.
The correct answer to this question is B) “American troops had to advance through areas devastated by war.”
<em>The pictures reveal that during the United States campaign in Germany in 1945, American troops had to advance through areas devastated by war.</em>
During the final months of World Word II, the Allied forces invaded German territory with strategies designed to invade and capture the Rhine River banks. The Allied forces designed four operations in February and March 1945 to do so. Those were operation Grenade and operation Veritable in February, and operation Undertone and operation Lumberjack in March. As it is revealed in the pictures, during the United States campaign in Germany in 1945, American troops had to advance through areas devastated by war.
