Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
The correct answer to the question is Option no. D Northern states profiting and southern states struggling.
In those times the Northern States were had higher incomes and living standards compared to the Souther States.
Hence, this cartoon illustrastes the differences in the economic conditions within the North and the South.
On the other hand, the Americans had many intangible advantages. The British fought a war far from home. Military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations. ... They had to persuade the Americans to give up their claims of independence.
Whether reporters should point out in stories when sources are saying things that are demonstrably false
Answer:
They created irrigation systems and used canals to control flooding. They also used the silt brought by the floods to help with their farming.
