<span>The scenario in which Alex sees a girl in a red shirt steal a candy bar and </span>during questioning, the police ask what candy the girl in the blue shirt stole and then <span> months later, when alex testifies in court, he describes the girl as having worn a blue shirt is an example </span><span>suggestibility. Correct answer: B
</span> Alex accepted the police suggestion (<span>during questioning, the police ask what candy the girl in the blue shirt stole ).</span>
I assume your question is why does he have to leave the room before the final discussion?
Well, he might have, as an active member of the IRB, a conflict of interest, meaning that he could be biased to vote in favor of his work which is incorrect, as researchers need to be objective regarding what they are studying. The National Academy Press. (2009). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is a great book you might read to understand the duties of any IRB and its members responsibilities, also the researchers' behavior. On it, is detail why a conflict of interest can guide to the decision of not conducting a certain research, independently of the undeniable reputation of Dr. Jones.
Answer:
Dave's attire strategy likely indicates he is a high self-monitor.
Explanation:
High self-monitors are people who respond to social clues by adjusting themselves to those clues. That is, they present themselves differently in accordance to each individual situation. That includes not only their appearance, but also their behavior. It is common for high self-monitors to hold jobs that involve dealing with an audience or a large group of people - acting, diplomacy, and public relations, among others. Dave shows concern by how his appearance fits in with the situation. He is capable of adapting, adjusting, in a way that shows he is likely a high self-monitor.
The answer is that " crime is said to be <span>Offense-Specific".
</span>
Offense specific Crime implies that the guilty party or offender responds to attributes of the particular criminal act, for example, the estimation of the objective, insurance of the objective, police nearness, escape opportunity, transfer of the objective, guardianship of the objective, straightforward entry to the objective and so forth.
Sexual harassment is when you make any unwanted sexual based comments or actions towards another person.
Gender discrimination is when you treat someone as unequal based solely on their gender.
Sexual Orientation Discrimination is when you treat someone as unequal based solely on the subject of their Sexual Orientation (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Straight etc)
