This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following?
When the influence of the situation is _______, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of _______.
Select one:
a. weak; individual personalities
b. weak; external circumstances
c. strong; internal forces
d. strong; dispositions
Answer:
The correct option is letter A. When the influence of the situation is weak, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of individual personalities.
Explanation:
Since behavior is a product of a situation combined with the person, it is fair to think that the result may be accounted for differently according to how strong each element is. Thus, if a situation and the "sub-elements" it includes - such as the presence of others, cultural and social influences, and so on - are weak, it is only logic to assume that the element "person" will be predominant. The result behavior is, therefore, more likely to be a consequence of that individual's personality.
Answer:
This difference in ability involving the loss of speed but gain of caution best illustrates Baltes' principle that development is <u>Multidirectional</u>
Explanation:
According to the approach of development of the life cycle of Paul Baltes, development is a process in which everyone creates their ability to adapt to different life situations, in each period they will be affected by what happened before and what is to come. In addition, each one has its own characteristics and unique values. Multidirectional development is concerned to development that happens in more than one direction. Each person has a different life to that of the others according to the decisions that he makes or the circumstances. As people win in one area, they may lose in another at the same time. People seek to maximize profits and minimize losses by learning to manage or compensate for them.
Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that __________. have few concrete applications, have almost no critics or challengers, use outdated forms of reasoning
The answer is not supplied in the choices you gave. The answer is "have many variations". Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that have many variations.
Greek gods ( roman gods )were different because of the power and the minor and major gods. They were worshipped because of myths and fables. Greece wanted power that seemed to top others gods. so they came up with the idea of the Greek gods and then programmed into that idea of demi gods.
