Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
The answer is ex post facto. This is a law where in it
changes retroactively in terms of consequences that are considered to be legal.
With this, it allows convicted criminals to have no increase in their sentences
because of this law.
<span>Protect the cervical spine and monitor the patient's neurological status. I hope this helped, good luck! :)</span>
I believe the answer is: a. <span> audience members who are asked to applaud after a speaker is introduced.
Social loafing refers to the social process when an individuals start to making less effort to work when they're in a group setting compared to when they're working individually.
When audiences is asked to give applaud , most of you would notice that some of the audiences would clap slower or not clap at all because they believe the other audiences would cover for them.</span><span />
The correct answer would be option C, Cooperate with each other but fail to gain long term benefits.
Explanation:
Social Trap is a concept in psychology, which states that when a group of people act in a way that they obtain the short term goals, but they are unable to get benefit out of it in the long run, then the situation is called as the social trap.
So A social trap is a condition in which individuals cooperate with each other but fail to gain long term benefits.
The most common and simple example of social trap is drinking at parties. Individuals drink together to gain short term goals of pleasure and happiness and being lost in another world which is free of sorrows, but the long term effect of drinking too much is not beneficial at all. It means they gained the short term goal but failed to gain long term benefits.
Learn more about goals at:
brainly.com/question/11895183
#LearnWithBrainly
