Answer:
of Educ., 526 U.S. 629 (1999). To be actionable, the school must either have caused the harassment or made students vulnerable to it. ... Finally, a school remains deliberately indifferent to the harassment where its response was clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances.
Explanation:
Learned bout it in school because a student was mad and wanted to press charges about something and this was brought up
Answer:
- They learn to hunt from the natives
- They learn the types of crops that can be grown in the new territory along with methods to farm them efficiently
- They learn food preservation technique from the natives
Explanation:
When the early Colonist just arrived, they experienced difficulties in the new Environment since there were not many technology available like they used to in their homeland.
So, in order to survive, they are befriending the natives so they can a lot of things from their way of living.
The natives taught them how to made weapons and hunt (such as spears and bows) , the types of foods that are edible and can be grown (such as maize) , and the time period where they should gather most of their food (they caught most of them before winter and dry them so the foods can be preserved in the warehouse).
Answer: Unreliable Narrator is the one who has his credibility compromised, either by lying or by presenting a questionable sanity. By telling lies, hiding information the narrator does not act in accordance with the narrative norms of the work. However, it is difficult to measure whether the reader really understands all the norms; after all, the narrator's contradiction can only be in opposition to the reader's understanding of that fictional world.
Thus, considering a narrative as unreliable can be configured as a kind of reader strategy that directs the narrator any and all interpretive discrepancies. Therefore, to question the credibility of the narrator it is also necessary to question the individual understanding of each reader.
The unreliable narrator's procedure contributes to the works maintaining the suspense character by narrating the actions inaccurately or incorrectly. The reader is waiting for when the narrator will be unmasked by any character or at what point in the plot will be evident that the sources used by the narrator are false or false.
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
Answer
Pull factor in migration
Explanation
A pull factor best describes things that attracts people to a country, a religion ,an organization, a region e.t.c Native Americans who were the people who discovered and lived in the America very many years ago. They were promised new lands in the west where they would be protected from land-hungry homesteaders which in migration is considered as a pull factor in migration .Migration is a global phenomenon which is caused by economic and social political, cultural, environmental, health, education and transportation factors. Pull factors in migration are the positive aspects that attract immigrants .They include better education and job prospects,political stability and religious freedom.
