1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
3 years ago
9

For Greta Harrington and her husband Robert, it was love at first sight. The two were married for 52 years until cancer took her

husband at the age of 84. Greta is currently 83 years old, and her marriage produced three offspring: Samuel, 50 years old; Katherine, 45 years old; and Benjamin, 40 years old. In his will, Robert left all of his financial interests, a considerable sum valued at $5 million, entirely to his wife; in his will, he also expressed love and affection for his three children, as well as the desire that Greta devise the remainder of the couple’s estate to their children, in equal portions, upon her death. Greta has recently been “keeping company” with Gary Watson, a twice-divorced, 65-year-old bachelor with a reputation for “womanizing.” While visiting her mother one weekend, Katherine is shocked to see a fully-executed will on the desk in the living room, devising all of her mother’s estate to Gary Watson. She immediately calls Samuel and Benjamin, schedules an emergency “sibling meeting” for Sunday, and wonders what to do about her mother’s ill-advised decision. She has noticed in recent months that her mother is often forgetful, frequently calls her “Sharon” (her aunt’s name,) and often confuses the days of the week. Do the children have any legal rights in terms of successfully invalidating Greta Harrington’s will? From a legal and/or ethical standpoint, should a mother (even of adult children) be allowed to “disinherit” her offspring?
Social Studies
1 answer:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

In this question, Greta, a mother of 3 children and the widower of Mr Robert, devising all her estate to a womanizer Gary Watson; which, by will of Robert, is to be transferred to the Children equally after the death of Greta. So Yes, children have absolutely the legal rights in invalidating Greta's will on the basis of their father's will in which he clearly told Greta to transfer the property to his children. Now from the legal and Ethical point of view, a mother should not be allowed to disinherit her offspring. The only people entitled to receive parent's property should be their children. And also Greta has developed the problem of being forgetful, the case for the children would be super easy to win, plus the reputation of the womanizer would also help children in winning the case.

You might be interested in
A society that remains relatively unchanged because of its separation from other societies by mountain ranges, dense jungles, or
mr Goodwill [35]

The correct answer is the physical environment

There are several factors that contribute to change and innovation in a society: factors internal to the society itself or external factors of the environment that surrounds it. Nowadays, the extreme importance of the relationship between society and its environment has become very clear. The environment is not only a crucial source for the maintenance of society with its climatic and geographic characteristics in general, its natural wealth, its sources of energy, its flora and fauna, all functioning as a set of conditions in relation to which the society must adapt. In this process, society can interact with its environment in different ways and directions: either contributing to improve or to worsen and impair its living conditions. Changes in the environment end up forcing changes in society. Societies, throughout history, have needed to adjust to changes in the environment. This is an unquestionable adaptation process.

The environment to which a society must adapt also includes other societies with which it maintains contact. A major change in one tends to trigger a chain process with consequences for the others and forcing adjustments and innovations.

But there are other sources of change. The dynamics of forces within societies, which are part of the human condition itself, prevent society from remaining permanently stable. First, in the transmission of cultural heritage from one generation to another, changes of various types occur. As we saw earlier, individuals are not passive in forming habits, learning customs and receiving information as they grow and develop. Human beings are apparently, by their very nature, motivated to try new patterns of action. Motivation is often the simple curiosity that can be intensified by the cultural world. Or, the motivation may be simple material self-interest. Men seek to maximize their rewards, that is, to earn more and better as a result of their actions. In this way, experimentation and innovations are inevitable.

5 0
3 years ago
When it comes to being with a group, Lionel believes he needs to behave consistently, while Zlatan thinks he should adapt his be
Vsevolod [243]

Answer: The correct answer is A: Individualism; collectivism.

Explanation: Individualism focus on the goals and motivations of the individual. An individualist sets her/himself a particular set of objectives based on his terms and identity.

Collectivism focuses more on what's best for the group, what should the individual do to adapt in the best possible way to the group to contribute the most to it.

In this particular case, Lionel fits more the concept of individualism because he is setting himself a particular goal; to behave consistently.

Zlatan fits more with the concept of collectivism because he thinks that he should adapt his behavior to change while with the group.

Therefore, the correct answer is A) Individualism; collectivism.

3 0
3 years ago
Omar is making a scale model of the Statue of Liberty for a report on New York City . The Statue of Liberty is 305 feet measurin
cricket20 [7]
It is 30.5 ft. from ground to torch tip
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Martin Luther's efforts lead to the end of Christian unity in Europe and the beginning of Protestantism? Make sure to gi
mixer [17]

Martin Luther's efforts to reform the Roman Catholic Church led to the greatest religious schism ever seen in Europe.

The Catholic Church's inadequate response to Luther's very fair critiques led other groups to speak out and write, causing ideas and critiques to spread.

This led to the rise of Calvin and  Zwingli in Switzerland and the rise of British reform efforts which eventually led to the seizure of the monasteries and the establishment of the Anglican Church.

4 0
3 years ago
3- O que é paisagem ?​
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

Todas as características visíveis de uma zona de campo ou terreno

Explanation:

...

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A woman named Harriet Miller comes before a judge in a pretrial hearing. She pleads guilty to the charge of stealing money. Unde
    6·1 answer
  • What are some ways in which gender roles have changed from ancient to modern times?
    13·1 answer
  • eople who are dependable, responsible, and achievement-oriented are likely to score high on: Select one: A. Introversion B. Open
    5·1 answer
  • Social studies bill of rights
    13·1 answer
  • 7-10 help do as much as u can thanks so much if u answer all you get •BRAINLIEST•
    6·1 answer
  • The state vs. the national government describes an economic conflict. True False
    10·2 answers
  • Read the passages below, and answer the question that follows.
    5·1 answer
  • A population that has reached the largest number of individuals that the environment can
    13·1 answer
  • What characteristic of a written test would be most enhanced if every student were equally adept at test taking skills?
    14·1 answer
  • Who is the author of usa constitution?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!