1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
3 years ago
9

For Greta Harrington and her husband Robert, it was love at first sight. The two were married for 52 years until cancer took her

husband at the age of 84. Greta is currently 83 years old, and her marriage produced three offspring: Samuel, 50 years old; Katherine, 45 years old; and Benjamin, 40 years old. In his will, Robert left all of his financial interests, a considerable sum valued at $5 million, entirely to his wife; in his will, he also expressed love and affection for his three children, as well as the desire that Greta devise the remainder of the couple’s estate to their children, in equal portions, upon her death. Greta has recently been “keeping company” with Gary Watson, a twice-divorced, 65-year-old bachelor with a reputation for “womanizing.” While visiting her mother one weekend, Katherine is shocked to see a fully-executed will on the desk in the living room, devising all of her mother’s estate to Gary Watson. She immediately calls Samuel and Benjamin, schedules an emergency “sibling meeting” for Sunday, and wonders what to do about her mother’s ill-advised decision. She has noticed in recent months that her mother is often forgetful, frequently calls her “Sharon” (her aunt’s name,) and often confuses the days of the week. Do the children have any legal rights in terms of successfully invalidating Greta Harrington’s will? From a legal and/or ethical standpoint, should a mother (even of adult children) be allowed to “disinherit” her offspring?
Social Studies
1 answer:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

In this question, Greta, a mother of 3 children and the widower of Mr Robert, devising all her estate to a womanizer Gary Watson; which, by will of Robert, is to be transferred to the Children equally after the death of Greta. So Yes, children have absolutely the legal rights in invalidating Greta's will on the basis of their father's will in which he clearly told Greta to transfer the property to his children. Now from the legal and Ethical point of view, a mother should not be allowed to disinherit her offspring. The only people entitled to receive parent's property should be their children. And also Greta has developed the problem of being forgetful, the case for the children would be super easy to win, plus the reputation of the womanizer would also help children in winning the case.

You might be interested in
In one of the most infamous cases of the bystander effect, ____ neighbors watched as kitty genovese was repeatedly attacked and
kap26 [50]

Bystander effect or the bystander apathy as it is also known is a psychological phenomenon which states that people are less likely to help a person in need if a group of people is also present nearby. In the tragedy of Kitty Genovese not one of the 38 neighbors called the police. This shocking death is one of the most horrible examples of the bystander effect.





3 0
3 years ago
Which map would you choose if you were going to create a presentation involving the sovereignty movement of Canada's second-most
White raven [17]
A political map. This is because it shows population of people and their movements into certain regions
8 0
3 years ago
Is it true that a dependent variable is a description of properties and changes in matter, using numbers. Scientists use the SI
zzz [600]

Answer:

yes its true.

Explana

3 0
3 years ago
Interposition is a cue for depth perception in which closer objects?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

 

Interposition is a depth perception that occurs when one object overlaps another object that is related to the depth perception of an object. It is a monocular depth perception in which an object covers another object. It shows that the object that is overlapped and the object that overlapped another object appears as one that is further away. The monocular cue is another depth perception that has been perceived by one eye. It is the opposite of the binocular depth perception that requires both eyes to perceive an object.  

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!!!!!
Katarina [22]

Answer:

Patriarchy

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Considering what is known about memory, most telephone numbers are seven digits long because:
    13·1 answer
  • During the Gilded Age, a factory worker who was injured while working generally received
    8·2 answers
  • What are the two provisions governing the quartering of troops in private houses
    5·2 answers
  • Suppose you are evaluating an argument, and you decide that its reasoning is valid; and that it has three premises, two of which
    14·1 answer
  • A friend and co-worker has expressed concern about her drug use becoming abusive and requested you observe her habits. Which of
    6·1 answer
  • What are the characteristics of an arid climate, and where is this type of climate found in the Middle East? Write a
    14·1 answer
  • A method in which a person provides subjective information about his or her own thoughts, feelings, or behaviors, typically via
    15·1 answer
  • Porque se le concidio a rosas el poder publico?
    14·2 answers
  • What is ecconomic? <br> define ecconomic
    8·1 answer
  • Russia has an abundance of
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!