I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>
Answer:
In October 1938, Hitler marched into the Sudetenland. The Sudeten crisis began in February 1938 when Hitler demanded self-determination for all Germans in Austria and Czechoslovakia.
Explanation:
The living conditions were awful, and the employer can make you work for fewer wages. The employer can as well make you work more hours.Women and children were working. Just because the factories were booming doesn't mean the living conditions were right.Everyone was living close together and more diseases developed.
"Women who enjoy a higher social status are usually less educated than women of a lower social status", the given statement best explains the connection between the social status of women and a country's overall health.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
This statement best explains the relation between the social status of women and a country’s overall health because it explains the psychology of social class in any country. Here such difference is observed because the growth and development of people is immensely dependent on the environment they survived.
Hunger of Education is may also depend on discomfort one faced, which predicts the deficiency carried by any community or society in any nation but not all face struggles, some may get opportunities because their ancestors worked hard.
So, if women who enjoy higher social status and vision for the development of individuality then maybe they resulted from less education than the women with lower social status who target development for society and nation. However, here statement allows only for discussion of a probability rather than a surety.
Question:
The Spirit of Humanism
stressed the importance of the individual
.valued the knowledge produced by the Greeks and Romans
• sought a balance between intellect and religious faith
Which other point belongs in this list?
O strengthened the feudal system
o inspired Renaissance creativity
O opposed to the code of chivalry
O provided support for the Inquisition
Answer:
Inspired Renaissance creativity.
