We can actually deduce here that the societies in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Fahrenheit 451" similar is that there was someone who was available to fight for a cause. Both Atticus in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and Montag in "Fahrenheit 451" fought for something.
The enduring understanding that both societies share is that there must be a fighting in order for a breakthrough to be achieved. They diverged when one fought in a peaceful way and the other fought in a violent way.
The obstacles is seen as what they tried to overcome.
<h3>What is society?</h3>
Society is actually known to be made up of different individuals from different backgrounds living together in a geographical area in a particular time.
We can see that the above explanation actually gives us the similarity between "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Fahrenheit 451".
Learn more about "To Kill a Mockingbird" on brainly.com/question/1509680
#SPJ1
they are terrifying, please help me
Answer:
Stargirl is the most "manic pixie dream girl" who ever pixie-dreamgirl-ed. She's practically the prototype. She's the Alpha and Omega of the cliche, coined by critic Nathan Rabin in his review of 2005's "Elizabethtown." Stargirl dresses eccentrically, she carries around a ukulele, and her pet rat lives in her knapsack. She drifts above the rituals and pressures of high school, communing on a higher and much wiser plane. She exists in order to change the lives of others for the better. As seen through the eyes of Leo, a shy kid who only wants to fit in, she is nothing less than a Magical Creature. He believes she can actually make it rain. And maybe she can. There's something uncanny about Stargirl.
Explanation:
hope this helps! <3
A credible narrator or reliable narrator will tell the story from the point of view of the truth, it does not matter if she or he has any attachment to what is going on in the story, readers can trust their words and understand the circumstances the way they the story unfolds. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator will tell their story from their point of view, they will embelish their deeds, hide or down play their problems, therefore the reader will always have the impression that the unreliable narrator is conducing the reader to trust them.
The crediable narrator will bring the facts to the reader and put the reader in the story, the reader can have the feeling of engagement on the narration. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator brings the uncertainty feeling tothe reader and the reader can dot the i's as they please because they know they cannot fully trust the narrator.
Answer:
upbeat
Explanation:
don't want to consern people
