Answer:
Guerrilla warfare in the Peninsular War refers to the armed actions carried out by non-regular troops against Napoleon's Grand Armée in Spain and Portugal during the Peninsular War. These armed men were a constant source of harassment to the French army, as described by a Prussian officer fighting for the French: "Wherever we arrived, they disappeared, whenever we left, they arrived — they were everywhere and nowhere, they had no tangible center which could be attacked. The Peninsular War was significant in that it was the first to see a large-scale use of guerrilla warfare in European history and as a result of the guerrillas, Napoleon's troops were tied down on the Iberian peninsula, unable to conduct military operations elsewhere on the continent.The strain the guerrillas caused on the French troops led Napoleon to dub the conflict the "Spanish Ulcer."
hope this helps
Answer: What's the question?
Explanation:
srry i don't understand a lil slow today
Answer:
A banana is a fruit.
Explanation:
Bananas grow on trees.
The bananas we eat are genetically modified to not have seeds.
Wild bananas are almost inedible because of the number of seeds they contain.
Answer:
This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):
<em>Tape v. Hurley: </em><em>The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.
</em>
- This case ended in <u>March 1885</u>, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.
<em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark: </em><em>The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>March 28, 1898</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.
<em>Yick Wo v. Hopkins:</em><em> The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>May 10, 1886</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.
