For this case we have that by definition, the equation of a line in the point-slope form is given by:
Where:
m: It is the slope of the line and 
is a point through which the line passes.
We have the following equation of the slope-intersection form:
Where the slope is 
By definition, if two lines are perpendicular then the product of their slopes is -1.
Thus, a perpendicular line will have a slope:
Thus, the equation will be of the form:
Finally we substitute the given point and we have:
Answer:
Option B
Hello!
We know that Isaac played 20 games and won about 70% of them. Now, we must find what 70% of 20 is, so that we know how many games Isaac won.
First, convert the percentage to a decimal by dividing it by 100.
70% ÷ 100 = 0.70
Next, multiply the total amount of games Isaac played (20) by about how many he won (0.70):
20 × 0.70 = 14
ANSWER:
Isaac won about 14 games.
Answer:
a) H0: 
H1: 
b) 
And the critical values with 
on each tail are:
c) ![t=(10-1) [\frac{1.186}{1.34}]^2 =7.05](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D%2810-1%29%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B1.186%7D%7B1.34%7D%5D%5E2%20%3D7.05)
d) For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n = 10 sample size
s= 1.186 the sample deviation
the value that we want to test
represent the p value for the test
t represent the statistic (chi square test)
significance level
Part a
On this case we want to test if the true deviation is 1,34 or no, so the system of hypothesis are:
H0:
H1:
The statistic is given by:
![t=(n-1) [\frac{s}{\sigma_o}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D%28n-1%29%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bs%7D%7B%5Csigma_o%7D%5D%5E2%20)
Part b
The degrees of freedom are given by:
And the critical values with on each tail are:
Part c
Replacing the info we got:
Part d
For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34
Answer:
The 3rd one is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps.
Hi there
let me help you out
<span>
9 x 6 = 30 + </span><span>x
</span><span>
9 x 6 = 54
54= 30 + x
54 - 30 = x
24 = x
x = 24
</span>
