Option C:
is the predicted population when data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba65d/ba65d6d8d3cbdfab7b7fc425e2228c4fefed151c" alt="x=15"
Explanation:
The regression equation for an exponential data is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/458e3/458e35c05ca0713a427391e017268f11c9928293" alt="\log y=0.14x+0.4"
Where x is the number of years and
y is the population
We need to determine the predicted population when data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba65d/ba65d6d8d3cbdfab7b7fc425e2228c4fefed151c" alt="x=15"
The population x can be determined by substituting
in the equation data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/458e3/458e35c05ca0713a427391e017268f11c9928293" alt="\log y=0.14x+0.4"
Thus, we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94bf2/94bf2364a4bbe16853df252f2fd35be59d73cfba" alt="\log y=0.14(15)+0.4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8876/c8876a061a84562c16321f5a823d780a176ae36d" alt="\log y=2.1+0.4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8255a/8255afce7e9871128e8a9aff4fc6831b5acb3f9b" alt="\log y=2.5"
Using the logarithmic definition
then data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb224/fb2245b9d045bb32287644842b224ff8e2e57eff" alt="b=a^{c}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bbfc/0bbfcc8a30df88abc6dd631f918227069907d7b9" alt="\log _{10}(y)=2.5 \Rightarrow y=10^{2.5}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45958/459584d7aefbf8ad644f17aa2d26fc131643f0e1" alt="y=316.22776 \ldots"
Rounding off to the nearest whole number, we get,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11b2/f11b204edb34a82385e4eed1c4c315a62de94ddb" alt="y=316"
Thus, the predicted population when
is 316
Hence, Option C is the correct answer.
Answer:
c). Two tailed test
Step-by-step explanation:
The given hypothesis are
Null hypothesis: H0:μ= 1.7
Alternative hypothesis: H1:μ≠ 1.7
The alternative hypothesis demonstrates that mean number of children are not 1.7 in 2000. This means that mean number of children can be greater than 1.7 or mean number of children can be less than 1.7. Thus, the given alternative hypothesis indicates the two tailed test.
Answer:
202.90
Step-by-step explanation:
If 187.90 is the price before the sales tax, you will multiply it by the 0.08 tax which will give you 15.032. You take 15.032 and add it to 187.90 because that is the sales tax. And after you add it and round to the nearest cent you get 202.90
Um.... I am confused I do not know what u are asking me.
I am so sorry that I can not help , but isf I knew it I would help.
Answer:
Only Jude
Step-by-step explanation:
To show 28 x 2 we show 14 x 2 x 2
The x would be cancelled out in this process so x *x would work to enable a product of 56.