Answer:
"In every class" is a fragment. F
Explanation:
Whenever a phrase does not convey a complete thought on its own because it is missing the subject, the verb, or both, it is a sentence fragment. In other words, a fragment is a group of words that looks like a sentence but lacks something essential to make sense. An example of a fragment is: Wants to go (there is no subject).
"In every class" is missing both the verb and the subject, meaning it is incapable of expressing a full idea. Therefore, it is a fragment.
The Subjunctive is used to emphasize urgency or importance. It is used after certain expressions (see below).
Examples:
<span><span>I suggest that he study.</span><span>Is it essential that we be there?</span><span>Don recommended that you join the committee.
</span></span>
What is the question here?
I'd love to answer it. :)
d. linguistic influence is the idea that language affects what we think.
The precept of linguistic relativity is every now and then referred to as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, or Whorfianism, after the linguist who made it well-known, Benjamin Lee Whorf. positioned in reality, Whorf believed that language affects notion.
Forms of language exchange consist of sound adjustments, lexical changes, semantic adjustments, and syntactic changes. The branch of linguistics that is expressly concerned with modifications in a language (or in languages) over the years is historical linguistics (also referred to as diachronic linguistics).
Linguistic Determinism suggests that one's language determines the approaches one's mind constructs categories. First brought via Edward Sapir and elevated by way of his student Benjamin Lee Worf, the Sapir-Whorf speculation proposed that language styles lead to distinct patterns in idea (Ting-Toomey and Korzenny 1988).
Learn more about language here brainly.com/question/14034723
#SPJ1
Answer:
Or July 21, 1969 and from the point of view of Neil Armstrong himself as he walked on the moon.
Or maybe I’d be Abraham Lincoln on the day he delivered the Gettysburg Address. We all practiced that speech in school, so how awesome would it be to actually give it!
Or I could be a visitor to the Roman Senate on the Ides of March. Begin the day by exploring ancient Rome and then end it by watching one of the most important assassinations in the history of the world. Popcorn optional.
I think part of the rule has to be that you can’t meaningfully interfere with what happened on that day — otherwise we’d probably all be morally compelled to go back in time and kill Hitler circa 1929.
_________
I’m going to make two adjustments:
1) I’ll add a follow-up question about which date you’d pick in the future. So let’s say this: You have a time machine that allows you to enter a specific date and location, and you’re taken then/there for one day (it teleports you to the location too). You arrive at 6am and 18 hours later, at midnight, you’re safely returned to the present day in your home. It can be used once to bring you to the past and once to the future. Then it disappears.
2) I like the idea of actually being in the eyes of a person in history, but let’s say you can also choose to just be you plopped down there if you want to.
A couple other notes:
Explanation:
MORE POWER
