Answer:
She is unfamiliar with the <u>"mere exposure effect."</u>
Explanation:
When an individual hear or see something many times, he/she develops a preference for that thing merely, the reason is that an individual is so much familiar with that, this phenomenon is known as mere-exposure effect. Sometimes we also develop that effect when we watch any tv program so many times that we develop much familiarity with that program.
Answer:
the compensatory time that would be received is 13.5 hours
Explanation:
The computation of the compensatory time that would be received is as follows:
Actual hours worked 95
Less: Regular working hours 86 (43 hours × 2)
Overtime hours worked 9
Now
Compensatory time 13.5 (9 hours × 1.5)
Hence, the compensatory time that would be received is 13.5 hours
The correct answer is: decrease; $195; $190; $165.
A study found the noise from rock concerts to be harmful.
To correct the externality created by the concerts, the government imposes a tax $30 on sale of each unit.
The price of tickets was initially $190.
After the imposition of the corrective tax, the price increased to $195.
This increase in price will cause the demand for tickets to decrease. As a result, the number of concert tickets sold will decrease.
The socially optimal price of the tickets is $195, as this price eliminates externalities.
The private market price is the price which was creating externalities, in this case, it is $190.
We can find the price received by the firms by deducting the tax amount from the new price.
The price received by the firms is
= $195 - $30
= $165
Answer:
Option A will save her $4,500
Explanation:
Calculation to determine Which statement about the costs per year is true
First step is to calculate OPTION A cost per year
Option A Costs per Year
Work-Study $4,000
Tuition & Fees $10,000
Scholarship & Grants $7,000
Room & Board $11,500
Total $18,500
Second step is to calculate OPTION B cost per year
Option B Costs per Year
Work-study $4,000
Tuition & Fees $28,000
Scholarship & Grants $18,000
Room & Board $9,000
Total $23,000
Now let determine Which statement about the costs per year is true
Costs per year= $23,000-$18,500
Cost per year=$4,500
Therefore the statement about the costs per year that is true will be: Option A will save her $4,500 because the cost per year for OPTION A is LESS COSTLY than that of option B by $4,500.
