Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- A Cost variance seems to be the gap and difference between the expected expenditures incurred as well as the projected regular expenditures at just the start of such a time frame.
- Such variances have been used by administrators to assess and monitor the progress including its supply chains, expenditures as well as other activities.
⇒ Cost variance = Actual cost - Standard cost
Some other available options have no connection with the given case. So choice C seems to be the perfect solution to that.
Answer:
short-term ability of the enterprise to pay its maturing obligations and to meet unexpected needs for cash
Explanation:
A liquidity ratio can be regarded as type of financial ratio which is been utilized in determination of a ability of a company to pay out its short-term debt obligations. The metric is way to determine if there is a possibility for company to use its current as well as liquid and assets to cover up for its current liabilities.
It should be noted that A liquidity ratio measures short-term ability of the enterprise to pay its maturing obligations and to meet unexpected needs for cash.
Answer and Explanation:
The consequences of given transactions are as follows
a. Revenues rise by $3.2 million as the firm received an order
b. Earnings rise by $1.5 million as the firm received an order and it filled by an orders i,e ($3.2 - $1.7)
c. Receivables rise by $1.80 million as it determines the remaining balance which ultimately increased the receivable balance
d. Inventory declined by $1.7 million as the order is filled which ultimately declines the stock
e. The cash would rise by $1.4 million
= Earnings - receivable + inventory
= $1.5 million - $1.80 million + $1.7 million
= $1.4 million
Answer:
Option B - There are significant diseconomies of scope is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Option A is, not a condition that could improve the probability that the justice department would approve the merger.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman index is based on a restricted definition of the product market or the impact of foreign competition, the merger might be allowed.
It might also be permitted if one of the firms is in financial trouble, or if significant economies of scale exist in the industry.
Significant diseconomies of scope would only serve to make the merger less likely to be accepted.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
