This a simple interest question with the principal = $25,000 time = 90 days and rate = 7%.
The simple interest in an investment after t days is given by PRT / (100 x 360). where P = $25,000 R = 7% and T = 90
S.I = (25000 x 7 x 90) / (360 x 100) = 15750000 / 36000 = 437.5
Therefore, the amount of interest Jasper will collect is $437.50
Answer: $7,575
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the amount of the estimated average income for a proposed investment will be calculated as:
= Expected total income yield / Number of years
= $30300/4
= $7,575
Therefore, the amount of the estimated average income for the proposed investment is $7575.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) rises.
Explanation:
Each country in question will specialize in what is most efficient. At the same time, it will import the rest of the products in which they are most ineffective in terms of production. Although a country does not have an absolute advantage in producing any good, it may specialize in those goods in which it finds a greater comparative advantage and finally participate in the international market. In this sense, it can boost its foreign trade.
It is then the basic idea that countries choose to specialize in order to trade in activities where they have a certain advantage. That is, instead of producing what they do best in an absolute way, they produce what they do best in a relative way. Therefore, the difference with the theory of absolute advantage is that it does not produce what the country costs less, but the one with lower comparative costs.
I think the answer is C but i could be wrong
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
