Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": property rights must be clearly assigned to the parties involved in the dispute.
Explanation:
Named after British lawyer and economist Ronald Coase (<em>1910-2013</em>) the Coase Theorem states when there are competitive markets and no transaction costs bargaining will lead to an efficient and mutually beneficial outcome. The theorem affirms that when property rights are defined and divided, parties will gravitate to the most efficient and beneficial outcome.
Answer:
(2) 4%
Explanation:
The portfolio is considered to be less risky if its volatility is low. The higher standard deviation the more risky is the project. For Duke Energy and Microsoft the investment portfolio required is risk free investment. To calculate the risk free rate we calculate using the formula;
Var Rp = x1 2Var R1 + x2 2Var R2 +2 x1 x2 Corr (R1, R2) SD1 SD2
Var Rp = 0.14 + 0.44 + 2 (1) * (-1) * 6% * 24%
Solving for this we get the risk free investment at 4%.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option D, Legal Market for a market price that is lower.
Explanation:
If there is a store which sells the goods at the market price even though the government authorities have set the minimum price that can be charged, it means store is selling the product at a price which is higher than the minimum price set by the government, but it doesn't mean that the store owner is doing any illegal trading. This is because the government has set the lower price limit but that ceiling price is non binding. It is not necessary for the market sellers to sell at the price given by government. So they are operating in a legal market for a market price that is lower.
The answer is <span>convergent adaptation
</span><span>convergent adaptation refers to a situation when individuals from different lineages develop a similar feature for the purpose of survival. For the most part, this phenomenon is caused ecause both individuals are also exposed to similar external stimulus
</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
When consolidating parent and a wholly-owned subsidiary we aim to eliminate entries related to the inter company services. Since the subsidiary had recorded a debit to service expense when it was rendered, the adjusting entry would be a credit to the service expense amount by the same figure charged i.e. $600,000 in this case
