Answer:
We can make recommendations and conclusions about gender-based violence for our peers.
Regarding the recommendations, we can present arguments such as: A person should not be judged based on their gender, but on their actions and skills, we should not respond to any situation with violent acts, but with kindness and respect, every living being deserves to be respected and treated with consideration.
In relation to conclusions, we can present arguments such as: Everyone has the same rights and duties regardless of their genre, color, sexual orientation and religion. They should not be treated violently because of any of these factors.
Explanation:
Gender-based violence is characterized by the fact that one group of people (usually women) becomes the target of violence by another group of people because of their gender. This is because the aggressors see these victims as inferior and weak, who must be submissive to the wills that the aggressors have and must be punished as they see fit.
Use the "what if strategy" to keep alert and be prepared to spot hazards. In every step we need to take, we should examine first the surroundings and list down all the possible hazards and outcome that may happen. We should remember that an unsafe condition<span> and unsafe act results to accident or even death.</span>
The Southern Economy was not very strong due to the damages from the Civil War.
Answer:
The answer is non-participant observation method.
Explanation:
In this method, the researcher is not part of the group being studied. The reseracher must decide beforehand if the study is realistic, ethical and relevant for the research. Among the many different ways to carry out this method, it is posible for the researcher to observe a group at different times and locations, for short periods.
It is also important for the researcher to record not only the behaviour observed, but also the type of behaviour that did NOT occur.
