Answer: A pessimistic explanatory style
Explanation:
A pessimistic explanatory style refers the situation where people generally blame themselves for negative things happening to them.
The answer you are looking for is existentialism. Very popular during the Depression and going into the Second World War.
Answer: a) workbook was sent to him without links
Explanation:
According to the question, as per message of no presence of link on Edit links dialog box it indicates that links were not present workbook and thus the directed page of workbook cannot be opened .Brooke should suggest about workbook does not have links.
Other options are incorrect because editing is not done in workbook file of source,they are neither copied nor replaced or updated with similar name. Thus, the correct option is option(a).
Answer:
The major difference between retrograde amnesia and anterograde amnesia is the following: Retrograde amnesia is the inability to recall past memories while anterograde amnesia is the inability to create new memories.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
