Answer:
Price Floor led Excess Supply can be solved by : Preserving goods Buffer Stock ; or processing goods to increase their shelf life (in case of perishable goods like Milk)
Explanation:
Unregulated markets are at equilibrium where : market demand , market supply are equal ; and downward sloping demand curve , upward sloping supply curve intersect.
Price Floor is minimum mandated price set by government, below which a good can't be sold in the market. It is usually set above equilibrium price, to protect interest of sellers. Example : Minimum Support Price as minimum agricultural goods price to protect interest of farmers, Given Milk Price floor case.
Price Floor creates artificially higher prices ; so increases supply, decreases supply & hence creates Excess Supply. Government can solve this excess supply by preserving stock supply for contingent times , eg - maintaining buffer stock. If the good is of perishable nature, as given milk case : it should be processed further to increase its shelf life, eg - cheese, such that the stock supply can be released at a slower pace.
Answer:
The correct answer for option (a) is $1.15 and for option (b) is $1.33.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Present value (PV) = $1
Rate of interest (R) = 1.18% per month
Time period (for option a) (t1)= 12 months
Time period ( for option b) (t2)= 24 months
So, we can calculate the future value by using following formula:
FV = PV × ( 1 + R )^t
(a). By putting value in the formula:
FV = $1 ( 1 + 0.0118)^12
= $1 × 1.1511610877
= $1.15
FV = PV × ( 1 + R )^t
(b). By putting value in the formula:
FV = $1 ( 1 + 0.0118)^24
= $1 × 1.32517184983
= $1.33
Answer:
a) dominant tenement.
Explanation:
A dominant tenement is the owner of the land that gains the benefit in easements appurtenant.
A servient tenement is the owner of the land that provides the easements .
I hope my answer helps you.
I think it would be b cause when the work is done you cant hire new workers to do what is already done
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": countries with high purchasing power today may not continue to show the same growth in the future.
Explanation:
Even if during the past decade the world's major economies have been the same -<em>The U.S., Japan, China, Russia, and Germany</em>- it does not necessarily mean the scenario will not change for the next one hundred years. Some other countries like Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Belize, Luxembourg, and Australia have started to show signs of increasing development that could turn the worldwide economy into a new direction. The last five (5) countries are reported as being the top nations with the highest purchasing power for 2018.
