Answer:
The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws.
Explanation:
You most likely are in a presidential election. I am pretty sure of this because I believe only the presidential races have official 'nominations' of their Democratic and Republican candidates. Hope that helps!
Answer:
isolationist is a person who believes in keeping to one's own affairs rather than becoming involved in the affairs of others. A person who believes that the United States should mind its own business and not interfere with things going on in other countries is an example of an isolationist.
Explanation:
The American attitude shifted in favor of rights for Native Americans. This is based on "Polls showed that Americans believed in rights for Native Americans". Why it's not B is because it wasn't the polling that contributed to the act, but what the polls showed which is C.