Answer:
Spain . brainliest?
Explanation:
Spanish leaders formed alliances with some of the Indian tribes and provided them with tools, crops, livestock, and arms. The new materials available to these tribes gave them superior weaponry over their enemies. As Indians acquired horses, they became more mobile.
I believe the answer is A, citizeship
Answer: George Rogers Clark
Explanation: The Siege of Fort Vincennes was a Revolutionary War frontier battle fought in present-day Vincennes, Indiana won by a militia led by American commander George Rogers Clark over a British garrison led by Lieutenant Governor Henry Hamilton, the battle started on February 23, 1779 and ended February 25, 1779.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "rise in opposition over slavery," since this was what separated the Republicans from the Whigs. </span></span>
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
