Answer:
C: people can spread hatred as long as it is factually true.
Explanation:
You have a problem here. The first amendment prohibits saying or writing something that cause violence to erupt.
The first amendment also protects us from being the victims of libelous speech. I guess that means that hate speech is permitted as long as it is factually true. In Canada, hate speech has been made so that the Government can stop it. But it does not seem to be the same in the United States. So this one, I suppose should be in the group below.
I don't know how you choose between these two. All you can do is eliminate the two that are true and which the Federal Government cannot enforce.
1. Forcing people to belong to the same religion.
2. Burning flags
He accused the germans of violating the freedom of seas killing Americans and interfering with Mexico, hope i could help out. ^_^
Overall, the Islamic Empires in the Indian subcontinent continue to present an example of tolerant religious pluralism to present day.
<h3>What were the Islamic empires of India?</h3>
This can be used to refer to the sultanate of India. They were made up of 5 in total.
These people were known to have dominated a large part of South and Central Asia at the time.
Read more on Islamic empires here:
brainly.com/question/794276
#SPJ1
Answer:
i think its a but i could be wrong
hope this could maybe help you
Explanation:
