Answer:
The Persians followed a monotheistic religion called Zoroastrianism, which recognized only a single deity named Ahura Mazda. Based on the teachings of the Persian prophet Zoroaster, this was the official religion of the Persian Empire, although conquered peoples were allowed to practice their own religions. They treat them well. They allowed them to keep their religion and customs instead of forcing them to adapt to Persian ways. ... They could let people know about problems or thing they had to do.
Explanation:
<h3>So lets say y = The amount of money that's made and x = The number of hours worked. We need two equations. one for Tammy and one for Lia. Tammy's equation will be: y=7x+4 because she makes 7 dollars an hour plus 4 dollars for every item she sells. Lia's equation should be: y=10x+3 because she makes 10 dollars an hour plus 3 dollars for every item she sells. Now since we need to know when they will make the same amount of money, we put both the equations together to make 7x+4=10x+3. Now lets use the distributive property to solve that equation. </h3><h3>7x+4=10x+3</h3><h3> -4 -4</h3><h3> 7x=10x-1</h3><h3> -10x -10x</h3><h3>-3x=-1</h3><h3>x=0.3 repeated)</h3><h3>Now we plug x into Lia's equation and solve that.</h3><h3>y=10(
)+3</h3><h3>y=3.33+3</h3><h3>y=6.33</h3><h3>Now we write our answer as an ordered pair: (0.33, 6.33) </h3><h3>Buuuuuuuuuuuttt you can't have 0.333333333333 of an item so the final answer here would be NO SOLUTION.</h3>
Answer:
the moon is not close enough to the sun to make a big enough shadow
Explanation:
Answer:
privatization
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of privatization. This term refers to the process of transferring an enterprise or industry from the public sector to the private sector. In this situation the industry being transferred are the Parking Meter Systems.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
