Answer:
In 1670, there was not a country called the United States of America, but there was only a collection of British colonies which weren´t free; they were under the authority of England´s crown. In 1860, the USA was a well established independent and democratic country, despite the deep political and social divisions of the time that would lead to the Civil War. The nation had its Constitution, citizens´rights (it is true not all people could enjoy them because of slavery) and separation of powers. There were regular elections for president and Congress. Unfortunately, the democratic progress of the USA did not benefit all on an equal basis in the 19th century and good part of the 20th century. Even after the Civil War, the passing of the 14th Amendment and other laws, real legal equality was not achieved. Southern states approved legislation that impeded the effective use of African American rights to vote. So, democratic evolution hasn´t always generated benefits to all, but there´s been significant improvement since the 1960s.
Explanation:
The Correct Answer Would Be:
~ It was not known whether all states would respond to an attack on one state.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Was the first crusade successful?
Well, it all depends on which side we are talking about. If we are talking about the crusader's side, it was a success. Then, obviously, it was not for the Muslim side.
The first crusade was fought from 1096 to 1099. On July 14, 1099, after three years of intense combats, teh Crusaders finally captured the important city of Jerusalem, defeating the Muslim troops. After some research, some historians say that the Muslim army was not in the best shape because the Turks were already weak from fighting themselves.
Roosevelt essentially took the opposite approach as Hoover in taking on the Great Depression. Herbert Hoover thought that America and its economy could naturally recover from the Depression in due course, so he adamantly restrained the federal government from intervening on behalf of the people affected. On the other hand, Roosevelt dramatically increased employment by expanding the federal government and establishing agencies that would aid in relieving some of the country's worst problems.
The difference between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy lies on the fact that in the absolute monarchy, the monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers, whereas in the constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a hereditary or elected monarch. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the head is limited or boundary by the legislation outlined in a constitution
The law within a constitutional monarchy may differ from the law within an absolute monarchy. Differences between absolute and constitutional monarchies arised during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
Absolute monarchy is also known as undemocratic monarchy and constitutional monarchy is also denominateda liberal monarchy.
To sum up, the great main difference is that in the constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch, who is the head, is lmited by the constitution.
