Answer:
Management might opt for other than the most economical choice because:
- Controlling. E.g. Franchise can be helpful to increase earnings fast but the uncertainly of quality supplied by franchisees can hurt a firm in the long run.
- Branding. E.g. Some firms have a reputation for their hand-made products. Industrialized production can reduce cost per unit and increase productivity but the brand surely is affected.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. $125.00
Explanation:
Let us assume the x for invested in portfolio
Invested proportion × expected return of the optimal portfolio + (1 - invested proportion) × risk free rate = expected return
x × 7% + (1 - x) × 3% = 8%
7% x + 3% - 3% x = 8%
4% x = 5%
X = 1.25
Now the invested amount would be
= 1.25 × $500
= $625
So, the borrowed amount would be
= $625 - $500
= $125
Answer:
c. comparative advantage in
Explanation:
In economics, comparative advantage is the advantage a trade party has over the other party, in the production of a a particular good that has a relatively lower opportunity cost. It simply involves exploring the option that has overall best package.
North Carolina has a comparative advantage in sweet potato production relative to Florida, as the opportunity cost involved is lower, since there is little potential benefits North Carolina will get in the production of oranges.
Answer:
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Percentage downsize in the workforce = 15% = 0.15
Cost of exit interviews = $100
Normal separation cost = $5,000
Now,
Total separation cost per employee = Cost of exit interviews + Normal separation cost
= $100 + $5,000
= $5,100
Therefore,
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year