<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The given data is as follows:
Error rate = 4%, per hour payment of inspector = $8, inspection of units = at the rate of 49 per hour, cost = $9 per unit
The problem can be solved as considering an opportunity to have an improvement of 4% in the quality.
In case inspector is not hired then it will cost .04 multiply 9= $.3.6 per unit and in case the inspector is hired it will cost $ 0.163 approx.(8 divided by 49).
Therefore, on comparison, it is recommended to hire the inspector.
Answer: (C) Zanda will have higher inventory carrying costs.
Explanation:
The inventory carrying cost is one of the type of overall holding inventory cost that helps in identifying the various types of business expenses and also storing the various types of unsold goods and the services in the market.
The inventory carrying cost is also known as the holding cost and it is basically responsible for handling the cost system by using the estimated formula.
According to the given question, Zanda corporation is basically using the level production plan for the purpose identifying their business factors such as costs, demand and the products.
So, based on the given information is Zanda will have the high inventory carrying cost statement is true. Therefore, Option (C) is correct answer.
Answer:
24.8 per hour
Explanation:
There are 3 workers and hence are three workstations. Consecutive activities are assigned to each workstation such that workload is as uniform as possible
Hence the time in each workstation (WS) is,
WS1 = 45+55+15 = 115 seconds
WS2 = 25+50+5+30 = 110 seconds
WS3 = 95+50 = 145 seconds
Workstation 3 has the highest processing time and hence is the bottleneck and determines the capacity of the process
Therefore capacity = 1/145 per second = 3600/145 per hour = 24.8 per hour
Answer:
Strict about it's people and not a lot of people own cars. I thinks that's China or that's North Korea. In not sure
Answer:
The answer is "$4.311".
Explanation:
Calculating the EPS after the merger:



