How do you think the Constitution should be interpreted: strictly, so as to protect the rights of the states to decide controver
sial matters for themselves, or in an elastic manner, so as to be able to address modern problems? Make sure to explain why you believe the Constitution should be interpreted in that way. Avoid addressing and expressing your opinion on any one controversial decision in your answer.
Constitution can make the law but not against the people right because they have three branches and they have check and balance on each other if a constitutional make a wrong law against people right the judicial branch will never signed and the executive branch can veto a bill they can make a law against the people rights
I would want to be alive then because the Texas Revolution was a historic moment for the "Lone Star Republic of Texas." It was when Texas seceded from Mexico, and Mexico seceded from Spain, so it was a revolution within a revolution.
Explanation: There are some deadly pandemic attacks on the human history which have taken thousands of lives. Pandemic is a break out of any virus transmitted from other animal.The Spanish Flu of 1918 was one of the deadliest pandemic attack which have taken many lives.
