How do you think the Constitution should be interpreted: strictly, so as to protect the rights of the states to decide controver
sial matters for themselves, or in an elastic manner, so as to be able to address modern problems? Make sure to explain why you believe the Constitution should be interpreted in that way. Avoid addressing and expressing your opinion on any one controversial decision in your answer.
Constitution can make the law but not against the people right because they have three branches and they have check and balance on each other if a constitutional make a wrong law against people right the judicial branch will never signed and the executive branch can veto a bill they can make a law against the people rights
Answer: relief for the unemployed and poor, recovery of the economy back to normal levels, and reform of the financial system to prevent a repeat depression.
He believed that Europeans had no right to claim land unless directly purchased from Native Americans AND He believed that the government had to right to punish others for their religious beliefs
In 1836 Texas gained independence from Mexico although at the beginning was not to be included in the Union then it was incorporated since there were Northern Political Interests and then all this political entanglement could very possibly lead to war.
