1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
2 years ago
6

Change does not occur uniformly in history. Early in the 1900's many people in both the U.S., and the Soviet Union did not have

equal representation or decent living conditions. Between 1920 and 1950 both countries experienced sweeping political and civil-rights changes. It is important to identify, however, that change does not always mean progress for everyone. On your own, search the Internet for a civil rights timeline on the U.S., then search for a Russian civil-rights timeline. In the space below: List three major events that took place in each country between 1920 and 1950. Write a paragraph comparing the changes in each country. Based on your research, hypothesize the reasons for the difference in change. Your response should be in complete sentences and at least 150 words.
History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]2 years ago
8 0

US:

-1919: The nineteenth amendment gives women the right to vote.

It was quite a millestone to the USA, the victory tooke decades of protest.

-1929: Stock Market crash (Know as black Thursday)

It was the beggining of the greath depression, it started as a low decline, but people panicked and start to sell all their stocks.

-1945: World War 2 Ends

After bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Japan Surrenders, finalizing the war.

Soviet Union:

-1920: Estonian War of Independence.

Soviet Union signed the treaty of Tartu, renouncing all claims on Estonian territory.

-1932: Passport systemn was stablished in Soviet Union.

A decree by the central executive committee stablished the Passport.

It was the renouncing on Estonian Territory.

-1940: Winter War.

The moscow peace treaty was signed, ending the war.

I see big difference in between countrys at that time, while USA was in a facet where it was fighting more about rigths and fredom, a serie of events that will form the american future, they were changing their form of living, while Soviet Union was still working to aquire and delimit territory. SU keep fighting about owning and let go lands, you don´t see so much relevant events about fredom and comute between society, while in USA all the events were society related, Market Crash made a huge impact in the country, people were reforming their fredom and changing they way of thinking, making things happend togheter, seem like SU were not interested in their people.


You might be interested in
What was the crop-­lien system that emerged in the South and how did it shape the region after the Civil War?
elena55 [62]

Answer:

Crop Lien system was credit system. It became widespread among the cotton farmers in the southern regions of US. In the system the sharecroppers and tenant farmers who didn't possess land obtained supplies on credit from the local merchants, the merchants and the landowner used to get money from cotton sale and then what ever was left went to the farmer. The system ended in 1940's when the poor farmers moved to urban areas. this credit system developed during the American Civil war as the southern farmers had little cash and it was a way to get credit before the planting season. Due to the credit merchants were able to dictate the crops that farmer grew. The system was also  used by landowners, tenant farmers and sharecroppers.

4 0
3 years ago
What are the life zones of the Sandia Mountains? a. The seven levels of vegetation that rotates existence seasonally in the Sand
malfutka [58]
OOOHH i did this before your answer is C
4 0
3 years ago
According to Bolivar, how should senators be chosen?
Misha Larkins [42]

According to Bolivar, The office should be passed from father to son.

Answer: Option D

<u>Explanation:</u>

In the selection process of senators, Bolivar said that the senate should be hereditary. It should not be elective. If the procedure of selection of the senate is hereditary, there would be no repel by this reaction especially during the time of political conflict and it would lead to be a great form of republic. Rather it would be the soul of republic. Thus the office should be passed on from the father to the son in the form of hereditary passing of office.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did ashley get kicked off the challenge this season
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

Who knows?

Explanation:

I guess we'll never know ;-;

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the 1890s a turning point in American foreign policy history?
Nastasia [14]

The US started to rely on its military and economic power to pursue foreign policy goals

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Seventeenth Amendment made senators more directly responsible to the __________ who had elected them
    10·2 answers
  • What did the united states gain form the expansion
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following already existed in the americas prior to european discovery
    12·1 answer
  • Imagine that today’s texting technology was invented during the time in which the Roman Republic existed. What might a text mess
    12·1 answer
  • Describe the new urban consumer society of the 1920s. How did advertising help shape it?
    12·1 answer
  • What type of bonding does a material most likely have if it has a high melting point, is solid at room temperature, and easily d
    11·1 answer
  • How did the rise of nationalism impact Southwest Asia?
    13·1 answer
  • There was a changing attitude in colonists. Instead of seeing themselves as standing up for their rights as English people. They
    6·1 answer
  • How did some merchants become rich?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the correct definition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!