a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
b. The top-down approach can only be applied to specific business functions.
c. The top-down approach leaves other employees uncertain about their roles in the company.
d. The top-down approach is expensive to maintain, leaving the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Answer:
a. The self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
Explanation:
The top-down approach is a model in which there is a hierarchical style and the decisions are made by the manager and then informed down the organizational chart and the lower levels have to accept the decisions. In this approach, people in the lower levels have low participation and influence on the decisions and as the firm's industry is changing too much, this people would posses crucial information and specialized knowledge that the top level might not have and because of that, this approach might not be effective. According to that, the answer is that this scenario is wrong because the self-driving vehicle industry is changing too much for the top-down approach to be effective.
Okay call your credit card company up and ask them where the last purchase was and if your scared someone hacked into your account shut down your credit card. (if you do this you'll have to get a new one)<span />
Answer: the doctrine of unconscionability
Explanation:
The doctrine of unconscionability is a defense that is against enforcing a contract. From the question, we are informed that Orlin bought a refrigerator, on credit, from a salesman and the salesman want him to pay 10 times the worth of the refrigerator.
In this scenario, the contract is deemed to be unfair and also oppressive to Orlin, thus he a find it unconscionable and therefore he can refuse to enforce it. Therefore, if he wants to challenge the contract’s terms, the doctrine of unconscionability will be used.
Answer:
d. $487,750
Explanation:
Cost of goods manufactured
<em>Consider only the manufacturing costs</em>
Cost of goods manufactured = $145,000 + $200,000 + $ 170,000 + ($5.75 x 25,000) - $171,000
= $487,750
Note : Only overheads applied $143,750 ($5.75 x 25,000) are added to cost of goods manufactured instead of actual overheads.
Conclusion
the amount of cost of goods manufactured is $487,750
