The decision making method that Wilma uses is the bounded rationality. It is a type of decision making with only a short time they acquire in deciding up decisions in which Wilma has been doing in the scenario above. This type of decision making also allows a person to decide with only the few decisions that couldn't suffice them. This decision making is being portrayed in the given scenario above.
Answer:
b. Roma and Taylor
Explanation:
In this case each attorney is liable for his negligence, so Taylor will be liable for not appearing in court .
Roma is his supervisor, and he will also be liable because he is responsible for Taylor's performance.
The other attorneys in the firm will not be liable, because there is personal liability. When they are not directly involved in negligence, they will not be liable to Umberto.
Answer:
a. The shareholders will want to tender their shares.
c. The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
Explanation:
a. The value of the firm is 1.25 million shares* 15= $18.75 million.
Increase in value, 18.75*135% = $25.31 million, so now this is the value of the firm
If 50% of the shares are bought for $18.75 Million, you will buy 0.625 million shares, so the total amount that will be paid is $11.72 million.
Now, the money against shares will be borrowed as collateral. This means that the new value of the equity will be $25.31 million – $11.72 million = 13.59 million.
1.25 million shares are there so now the price of the share will be = $10.87 million ($13.59 million/$1.25 million = $ 10.87 million).
b.The price of the shares has decreased from $13.59 to $10.87 after the tender offer, everyone will want to tender their shares for $18.75.
c. Supposing everyone tenders the shares and you will buy at $18.75 per share, you will pay $23.44 (18.75 per share *1.25 million shares) to acquire the company and it will be worth $25.31 million.
The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
