Yes, it is true that the equilibrium theory of social change does not explain widespread social change within or <u>between societies.</u>
<h3>What is the equilibrium theory of social change? </h3>
The <em>equilibrium theory </em>explains the likelihood of the social system to again reach a <u>state of balance</u> when any change occurs in the society. Hence, the internal and external <em>relationship</em> between social elements is maintained.
Therefore, the social changes in different societies could not be measured as the equilibrium measures the social forces of a given society only.
Learn more about social theories here;
brainly.com/question/4123668
Answer: interpreting a person's behavior in comparison to others recently encountered
Explanation: halo effect is the tendency for an impression created in one area to influence opinion in another area.
Answer:
Correlation coefficient.
Explanation:
This is explained to be the numerical measure of some correlation types or strength statistically of relationship between two variables. It is most times seen to bre helpful when investing in the financial markets. In certain instances, correlation can be helpful in determining how well a mutual fund performs relative to its benchmark index, or another fund or asset class.
This correlation statistic or coefficient here is seen also to permit investors to determine when the correlation between two variables changes. This is seen in bank stocks where it is seen to typically have a highly-positive correlation to interest rates since loan rates are often calculated based on market interest rates.
False
..........................
John Rawls tossed this Latin expression around "a blank state" to enable us to comprehend ourselves in a circumstance in which there were no tenets. We needed to build up the standards for how we would communicate with each other exclusively and in business. Rawls trusted that judicious souls would concur on some fundamental and reasonable tenets that would help them additionally secure others.