The answer is D hope this helps! Have a great day! :)
The present-tense verb in the sentence is "teach."
The reason for this is, while "will see," "learned," and "lived" are all verbs as well, "will see" is future-tense; as the word "will" implies that it hasn't happened yet and has yet to happen, while "learned" and "lived" are past-tense, as the "-ed" implies that it already has happened--as the speaker of the sentence has already lived in Paris (and perhaps does not any longer) and learned French while they lived there. "Teach" is implying that it is going to happen at this instance, as there is no "will" in front of it to imply future-tense, and no "-ed" at the end to imply past-tense.
I hope this helped !!
I would argue that the character of the young Daisy Miller was an innocent flirt rather than a manipulator. She was full of life, of freedom, of sincerity, and of grace, and she was beautiful, carefree, charming, and certainly ahead of her time, but she was far from being a manipulator. She had "a great deal of gentlemen's society," as she herself pointed out, but she was unpretentious, "unsophisticated," and "completely uncultivated," as Winterbourne described her, so it is possible to say that she acted naturally, not in a manipulative way.
This can also be confirmed in the passage that narrates the moment when they both met: "... (Daisy) was a coquette; he was sure she had a spirit of her own; but in her bright, sweet, superficial little visage there was no mockery, no irony." This, once again, indicates that she was honest and straightforward, and far from Machiavellian.
Answer:
Was inspired by the countryside and landscapes.
Explanation:
I just finished taking that quiz.
