It is true that Erin has a diversified portfolio as he invest in different investment.
<h3>What is a Portfolio diversification?</h3>
This refers to investing of funds in different asset classes and securities in an attempt to minimize the risk of a portfolio.
Hence, It is true & yes that Erin has a diversified portfolio as he invest in different investment.
Read more about diversification
<em>brainly.com/question/417234</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. gain a higher market share.
2. inversely proportional to each other.
Explanation:
1. By producing a product at a lower price than the competitors a company will be at an advantage and will be providing same product at a lower price. The customer will definitely go with a low price item if two items are same in value.
2. As value creation requires cost so if the cost is reduced then some of the features will have to be foregone to achieve low cost.
Answer: She must continue to meet the minimum standards for license issuance.
Explanation:
Since Inez has completed the application, and also provided proof that she has satisfied the continuing education requirement, as well as paying for the renewal fee when she's applying to renew her loan originator license, it's also vital that she must continue to meet the minimum standards for license issuance.
The standards for license insurance should be met if not, she may not be able to renew her loan originator license. It should be hired that the provision of proof of continuing employment and a proof that she has no pending disciplinary issues from the previous licensing period isn't required in this case.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
A potential obligation that depends on the future outcome of past events is a contingent liability!
- An obligation is something that is to be done
- A potential obligation is a thing or activity that is among the options of stuff that can be done
- When something depends on the future outcome of past events, it introduces or carries with it, the cost of waiting (for future outcomes)
- A contingent liability is something that poses probability of loss instead of gain. The opposite of liability is asset.
So in business, a potential obligation or action that depends on the future outcome of past events is a contingent loss rather than gain.
<span>Fair value is defined as, a rational and unbiased estimate of the potential market price of a good, service, or asset. It takes into account such objective factors as: acquisition/production/distribution costs, replacement costs, or costs of close substitutes.
Since this is an opinion question, either answering yes or no is correct, but you have to say why.
If I understand the question correctly, and the question isn't missing any parts, I would assume it's asking if you should put value on contracts as a document and other financial instruments.
I was going to say no, but because contracts can be transferred or used as currency, I would say yes.
If you say yes I would argue that giving a fair value of the contracts would make them more legal and have more bearing in a place of business. That it would prevent the fluctuation of value on that contract based on other factors like profit/loss and whether or not you transferred, changed, etc. the contract. I would argue that to protect that contract and other financial instruments, and the holders stake in it, you should create a fair value for it.
If you say no, I would argue that the contract can already be treated as a form of currency, and because of that it should not have a fair value placed on it. I would also argue that because contracts often times state the value of that contract within itself, that it should not have a fair value. And finally, I would argue that because with time, the value of items change, you should not place a fair value on a document that can be changed and can lose or gain value with time based on the purposed information in the contract.
</span>
