Symbolic interactionists seek to understand the experience of inequality - how it is communicated and how that inequality is conveyed.
Social inequality is the state of unequal access to the benefits of a society. In a purely egalitarian society, all citizens are equally capable of contributing to the general welfare of that society, and they too can benefit from their membership in that society.
The functionalist theory of social inequality holds that stratification exists because it benefits society. Key examples of social inequality include income gap, gender inequality, health care, and social class. In the healthcare sector, some people get better and more professional care than others. They also have to pay more for these services.
Conflict theory views social life as a competition and focuses on the distribution of resources, power, and inequality. Symbolic interaction theory holds that people respond to elements in their environment based on subjective meanings. they are tied to these elements, such as the meanings created and modified by social interaction involving symbolic communication with others.
While it may sound like a big name, symbolic interactivity is how your experience adds subjective meaning to symbols and letters. For example, the word "dog" is just a series of letters. Through your interaction with the letters "dog", you see this is a dog with fur on four legs.
To learn more about inequality:
brainly.com/question/1870140
#SPJ4
Selling mittens during the winter is an example of time utility - a
the reason why mittens are a form of time utility is because they possess great utility during a certain period of time while they do not possess this utility during another time period.
<span>Cultural relativism also has the peculiar consequence that social reforms of every sort would always be wrong.
But in real life, it actually told otherwise. For example, take a look at the French Revolution, when the Government was so corrupted to the point where people became fed up and decided to overrule them. In this case, we can't really say that the social reform is in the wrong side. </span>
Answer:
i feel like the persuasive argument is like the casual "you should feel this way" type of argument,to get them on your side.as for the social comparison,im not too sure.sorry i couldnt help with that.
Explanation:
Answer: hudson bay hudson river
Explanation: