I believe the answer is D: Early followers had different opinions about who would lead them.
After the death of Prophet Muhammad, nobody knew who would lead them again, and the religion split apart into two due to this.
According to npr, most of the Prophet Muhammad's followers wanted the community of Muslims to determine who would succeed him; a smaller group thought that someone from his family should take up his mantle.
<em>If this is incorrect, please, don't refrain to tell me. Thank you. </em>
Answer:
There was no going back. This is the story of the removal of the Cherokee Nation from its ancestral homeland in parts of North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama to land set aside for American Indians in what is now the state of Oklahoma.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
The advantage is that the person under different class, gender and other categories of identity have different legacy from their ancestor. They learn skills according on the basis of their background. And maybe someone else from different background cannot learn skills as much perfectly as the person from background.
For example:
It is easy for a farmer's children to learn farming more detailed rather than the children of barber.
But in modern world, anybody can learn whichever skills they want through the internet. But to some extinct it offers a distinct advantage.
