Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
A What is the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift?
B What is the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift?
C What is the probability that at least two different shifts will be represented among the selected workers.
A)
The total number of workers = 10 + 8 + 6 = 24
The probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift is given as:
B) The probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift (
) = probability that all 4 selected workers will be the day shift + probability that all 4 selected workers will be the swing shift + probability that all 4 selected workers will be the graveyard shift.
Hence:
C) The probability that at least two different shifts will be represented among the selected workers (
)= 1 - the probability that all 4 selected workers will be the same shift()
Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."
This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.
In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521
The difference between an inventor and an entrepreneur is that, an inventor develops new services and goods but he does not have them to the market. An entrepreneur risks resources may it be human, capital or natural in order to bring to the market improved and new products.
The risk which is incurred between entrepreneur and inventor is that, entrepreneur undergoes huge financial risks because a lot of money is being invested while inventor has low financial risk since there is no big investment which is being required.
Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
