The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
Answer:
As per Chegg guidelines .
Explanation:
For a high-context culture, the social environment or social context has more importance than the words being spoken. This means that in a high context culture, low-contex culture is not as important as the nonverbal communication, because nonverbal communication has more importance . For the high-context culture, a contract is just a beginning point for negotiations in closing the deal. Signing of the contract does not necessary means closing of the business deal. Some of the examples of high-context cultures are China, most Arab countries, Latin America, most African countries, most other Asian countries, and Italy. In reality, most cultures fall somewhere along a continuum, or sliding scale, in their perception of the importance of context (with high and low being the end points of the continuum
A competitive market has many producers competing with one another to satisfy the wants and needs of many consumers. In a free competitive market, the prices of goods and services are set by the consumers and supply and demand aren't regulated by the government. Knowing this, in a free competitive market the rationing mechanism is based on price.
Himself I believe. Unless. Something made him fall -proper gear, slopes, borrowed equipment- if none of these are acquired then it would be himself because no one is at fault other than himself... hopefully this is right?
Good luck!
