1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NemiM [27]
3 years ago
9

The Anti-Federalists’ main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it

History
2 answers:
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
4 0

A. had no bill of rights.

grandymaker [24]3 years ago
3 0

i think the best answer would be a because anti-federalist were all afraid that the they would not have there rights and wanted the bill of rights to be added  so they voted to ratify the Constitution. therefore the best answer is a.

If this helped you please mark me brainiest.

If not I am so sorry.

You might be interested in
PLZZ HELP ME!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLEST
shtirl [24]

Answer:

1. The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American .

2. Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a British loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.

3.The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.

4. Skirmishes between colonists and soldiers—and between patriot colonists and colonists loyal to Britain (loyalists)—were increasingly common. His gunfire struck and killed an 11-year-old boy named Christopher Seider and further enraged the patriots.

5.John Adams agreed to defend the eight British soldiers in court, risking his political status, due to his belief in fairness of law and justice, the basic structure of laws in the United States. In the end of his battle for integrity of the law, his sacrifices were rewarded when he won the case.

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Did the enlightment theory view the role of government as benovalent
alexandr1967 [171]
No, the mainstream <span>enlightenment theory did not view the role of government as benevolent, since it largely viewed it as corrupt, which is why many people during this time sought to put more power in the hands of the people </span>
5 0
4 years ago
If you were to travel back in time to witness the founding of Buddhism, how far back would you travel?
vazorg [7]

Answer:

You'd want to go back around to 500 BC

Explanation:

Bhudda would've been born around 500-400 BC if you traveled back any further you wouldn't be able to meet him.

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP MAKING BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT
defon
(a) is the answer in studying this actually!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine que es un pensador durante la época de la Ilustración. Escriba un párrafo defendiendo alguna idea de la época.
NNADVOKAT [17]

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

El pensador durante la época de la Ilustración que elijo es Varón de Montesquieu. Este sería el párrafo defendiendo la siguiente idea.

Yo, Varón de Montesquieu, quiero recomendar que los modernos sistemas de gobierno tengan una clara división de poderes. La recomendación que hado es una división de tres ramas o áreas que son las siguientes.

Una rama el el Poder Ejecutivo, que recae en un Presidente que tiene a su cargo un gabinete de expertos en distintas áreas.

Otra rama es el Poder Legislativo, tan bien llamado Congreso. Este Congreso tendrá la facultad de crear, votar y vetar leyes. Su prioridad es crear leyes que beneficien al pueblo.

Finalmente, la tercer rama del gobierno es un Poder Judicial, un sistema de justicia que sea imparcial y pueda declarar la inconstitucionalidad de alguna ley.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does George Washington's account contradict or support the account in the newspaper? Give two examples to support your response.
    7·2 answers
  • Which most accurately explains how John Locke’s Two Treatises of Civil Government influenced the movement towards American indep
    5·1 answer
  • What impact did the shift toward capitalism have on the structure of German society? Bonus question: How does the emergence of c
    13·1 answer
  • Which act in 1898 asserted the dominance of federal law over American Indian's tribal laws and treaties?
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone please help
    7·1 answer
  • How did Jaja of Opobo position himself to lead Anna Pepple House?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these details would be relevant
    5·1 answer
  • What has The Epic of Gilgamesh revealed to archaeologists about
    10·1 answer
  • Which person meets the qualifications to serve as Georgia's governor?
    12·2 answers
  • How were craft unions different from labor unions?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!