Mexico, Hope that helps. :)
Answer:
The passage is talking about Aristotle.
Explanation:
Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who lived from 384 BC to 322 BC. He is considered to this day the father of rhetoric, that is, the art of convincing others through speaking or writing. According to Aristotle, there are three rhetorical techniques that can be employed to persuade one's audience: pathos, logos, and ethos. Pathos appeals to the audience's emotions (pity, empathy, etc.), logos appeals to logic and reasoning, and ethos appeals to the speaker's character and credibility.
Relational dialectics are opposite or contradictory needs in a certain relationship between the partners. This theory of interpersonal communicaiotn was proposed by Leslie Baxter and W. K. Rawlins. What the these needs, the need for solitude and the need for connection in Lisa illustrate the <span>autonomy/connection relationship dialectic. </span>
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that American state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case that overturned the 'separate but equal' approach to public schooling. ... In its decision, the Supreme Court reversed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, which originally upheld the 'separate but equal' laws
Answer: unreliability
Explanation: Some of the problems that determine the quality of an experiment are reliability and validity.
Reliability considers the consistency of the experiment. In the example above, the result of the second sample is inconsistent with the result of the first sample, making Watt's research unreliable. That is, it does not reflect the ratings of a larger population. This problem can be solved by increasing the sample size, such that the average ratings are more reflective of a wider audience.
Validity considers the accuracy of the experiment. A lack of reliability of an experiment will likely make the result invalid as well, but this is not always the case.
