Answer: Social psychologists would call this confusion a cosequence of pluralistic ignorance
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance is a situation in which most members of a group privately reject a rule, but go along with it since they incorrectly assume that most others accept it. This is also described as "no one believes, but everyone thinks that everyone believes". In a nutshell, pluralistic ignorance is a bias about a social group, supported by the members of that social group.
Answer: Income effect refers to the change in an income earned by an individual and with a percentage change upward or downward impacts consumer buying/ purchasing power of it
Explanation: You didn't put the answer choices so ii couldn't tell you exactly which one.
Answer:
D. all of these options
Explanation:
During the preconventional level of moral development , humans take developed our moral standard based on what the authority figures told us to. This tend to happen during our childhood, when our parents basically the one that determine what we should consider as right and wrong. (they will punish us if we behave in a way that they do not like)
This what make our moral judgement become self-centered. Since we only believe what our parents told us as absolute truth, we refuse the moral standard that is held by other people who were taught differently. But the truth is more complicated that that. Society's rule making process tend to be influenced by different cultures, religion , and personal experience that might vary between each individuals.
The answer is : Glum Drops. They are the saddest candy since there is a play with words here. Glum means sad and Drops mean gum drops or candy. There was this math problem wherein you cross out all the letters with the correct answers and the remaining letters will form the answer to the questions.
Answer: School Judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics based on the individual. I know this because everybody makes mistakes, and if you base a person off the mistakes they might've made in the past, your biased and unfair. From my background knowledge, I remember a show on TV called divorce court, this man was judged because of mistakes he did when he was fifteen, he didn't even know better, and he might've been battling his own mind, he didn't deserve to be judged based on his past mistakes. In conclusion, judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics of an individual because it's biased.
Explanation:
