Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer. While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole. The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.) Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage. Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together. This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise. Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red. This forces them to make cuts in staffing. Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find. Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help. If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job. This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings. Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker. This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.
I think the answer is that Japan got Manchuria
For 391 years, going from 794 to 1185, the real power in Japan was in the hands of the Fujiwara family (A option), they achieved that by monopolizing regent positions. The seize of power by abdicated emperors at the 11th century followed by the rise of the Samurais led to Fujiwara's gradual decline.
Oklahoma's economic history is divided into four periods. The first period covers the nineteenth century, encompassing settlement by American Indians of the Southeast followed by new arrangements facilitating private land ownership. The second extends from 1900 to the onset of the Great Depression in 1930. The third ends in 1973 with the first of the major oil shocks. The fourth comprises the energy boom and bust of the late twentieth century, along with contemporary conditions.
The century from 1800 to 1900 encompassed the time of Indian and white settlement. During the nineteenth century Oklahoma was characterized by very high ratios of land to labor and capital, by almost total dominance of primary (natural resource based) production, and by unique institutional and cultural features, of which the effects of some remain important in today's economy. The initial settlement by the Five Civilized Tribes in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s in what is now Oklahoma (at that time Indian Territory) did not reflect free-market labor migration in response to income differentials. Added to the coercion of removal was the fact that the Five Tribes had adopted the institution of slavery in their former southern setting. Slave-owning Indians brought with them an additional labor supply.
Answer:
scurvy and pneumonia caused by a lack of shelter in the cold, wet weather.
Explanation:
