Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
<em>c. Synergistic Strategic Alliance</em>
Explanation:
Synergistic Strategic Alliance is <em>a two-way partnership where both of them collaborate with each other and share their core competencies with one another to make their total output more than mutual individual outputs.</em>
Therefore, through synergistic actions, both companies turn their vulnerabilities into strengths and thus become more effective on the marketplace.
Annual interest rate that factors in compounding effects.
Formula: APY = ( 1 + APR/n )^n - 1
Answer:
a. The power and influence of industry driving forces
Explanation:
As per Michael Porter, there exist five competitive forces that influence competition in an industry. The five forces as per Porter are:
- Potential entrants
- Industry competitors
- Customers
- Substitutes
- Suppliers
Potential entrants refers to the risk of new entrants in the market.
Industry competitors refers to the extent of rivalry and competition between existing firms.
Customers relate to the negotiating or bargaining power of the customers and to what extent they exercise such power.
Substitutes refer to the emergence of substitute products in the market which may drive down a firm's sales.
Suppliers relate to the bargaining power exercised by suppliers with respect to inputs.
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
