1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
3 years ago
13

What caused King Philip's War?

History
2 answers:
loris [4]3 years ago
6 0
The English drew and quartered Philip’s body and publicly displayed his head on a stake in Plymouth .
Alex17521 [72]3 years ago
3 0
The English met with King Philip, chief of the Wampanoag, and demanded that his forces surrender their arms. The Wampanoag did so, but in 1675 a Christian Native American who had been acting as an informer to the English was murdered, and three Wampanoag were tried and executed for the crime. The destruction of a Narragansett village by the English brought the Narragansett into the conflict on the side of King Philip, and within a few months several other tribes and all the New England colonies were involved.

I got this from internet but I hope this helped :)
You might be interested in
How has art evolved over the years? Explain in 1-2 paragraphs please (3 would be greatly appreciated)
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Ancient art, dating from around 3500 BC, hails from Egypt, China, Persia, Mesopotamia, and Greece. Ancient art shows the beginnings of more imaginative works, which focus less on what could be seen in everyday life, and more on what might be seen in the afterlife. Gods and goddesses were particularly popular subject matter, as was what these deities would do once a person had ‘crossed over’ to their kingdom. Symbolism was rife in ancient art, and the art itself was used as a way of instructing the common people in the laws, practices, and religion of the country.

In Egypt, for example, the pharaohs were also captured in art, and would always be shown as the largest figure in a painting. This was to show the pharaoh’s importance and was not drawn to scale. Animals were often depicted but were drawn in unusual colours, each one having a different meaning.

8 0
3 years ago
What three things were the underlying reasons for trouble between native Americans and European settlers?
sweet-ann [11.9K]
I think communication for one
maybe land ownership 
not sure for another reason

4 0
4 years ago
Was the cost of war higher for the North or South during the Civil War? Please give evidence of how and why! thank youuuu.
skad [1K]
The American economy was caught in transition on the eve of the Civil War. What had been an almost purely agricultural economy in 1800 was in the first stages of an industrial revolution which would result in the United States becoming one of the world's leading industrial powers by 1900. But the beginnings of the industrial revolution in the prewar years was almost exclusively limited to the regions north of the Mason-Dixon line, leaving much of the South far behind.

In 1860, the South was still predominantly agricultural, highly dependent upon the sale of staples to a world market. By 1815, cotton was the most valuable export in the United States; by 1840, it was worth more than all other exports combined. But while the southern states produced two-thirds of the world's supply of cotton, the South had little manufacturing capability, about 29 percent of the railroad tracks, and only 13 percent of the nation's banks. The South did experiment with using slave labor in manufacturing, but for the most part it was well satisfied with its agricultural economy.

The North, by contrast, was well on its way toward a commercial and manufacturing economy, which would have a direct impact on its war making ability. By 1860, 90 percent of the nation's manufacturing output came from northern states. The North produced 17 times more cotton and woolen textiles than the South, 30 times more leather goods, 20 times more pig iron, and 32 times more firearms. The North produced 3,200 firearms to every 100 produced in the South. Only about 40 percent of the Northern population was still engaged in agriculture by 1860, as compared to 84 percent of the South.

Even in the agricultural sector, Northern farmers were out-producing their southern counterparts in several important areas, as Southern agriculture remained labor intensive while northern agriculture became increasingly mechanized. By 1860, the free states had nearly twice the value of farm machinery per acre and per farm worker as did the slave states, leading to increased productivity. As a result, in 1860, the Northern states produced half of the nation's corn, four-fifths of its wheat, and seven-eighths of its oats. So basically the south
8 0
3 years ago
What was the role of winston churchill during world war ii?
ipn [44]

Answer:

Prime Minister of Britain

4 0
3 years ago
Which person is performing a civil Duty
MissTica
The answer to the question is C
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Islam was introduced into West Africa by
    11·2 answers
  • I need help with both asap my hw is do tomorrow
    9·1 answer
  • How did caesar and augustus expand the empire?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the u.s. government want to achieve
    6·1 answer
  • The country of Belize is located in _____________.
    10·1 answer
  • Why did pirates attack Spanish ships during the Spanish Armada? Simple answer would be appreciated!
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ! ( After Auschwitz )Select two sentences that best state the author’s message in the selection.
    8·1 answer
  • Climate covers<br> A. smaller areas than weather. B. larger areas than weather.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of Buddhism?
    7·1 answer
  • Which detail from the text best supports your answer from part A?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!